Wayfaring Attentiveness ~ Circulating Impressions : The capacity to keep something moving.

 

Wayfaring Attentiveness ~ Circulating Impressions

Wayfaring Attentiveness : Matter(s) of Relational Resonance.

Timbre~Correspondence~Persistent Bodies 

A cross-marking impression acts as a circulating~spatial body within its own performative atmosphere.

Yes, looking at that locating marking~body, we can sense that it does momentarily locate the circulating~wayfaring field for further relations already taking place.

The lead came is temporarily introduced into the clay field as a spatial instrument of relation. It presses into the clay, interrupts its surface, and momentarily gives a particular configuration of relations a location. But that location is not fixed. As the clay continues to be worked, altered and eventually fired, the impression passes from an active clay relation into the withdrawn ceramic body.

Wayfaring Attentiveness ~ Circulating Impressions

This reading apparatus approaches the ceramic impression as a material event of provisional location. Pressed into clay, the lead came momentarily locates relations already unfolding between bodies, forces and surfaces. The resulting mark is neither a fixed symbol nor a completed diagram. It is a temporary spatial instrument through which movement becomes perceptible without being brought to a halt.

Wayfaring describes the movement through which these relations acquire form. Lines encounter resistance, cross other traces, disappear into the surface and re-emerge elsewhere. The ceramic field is not a predetermined territory traversed by marks; it is a territory continually produced through their encounters. Attentiveness becomes a way of following these movements without determining their destination.

Firing alters the material conditions of the impression. What was formed within the provisional clay field passes into the withdrawn ceramic body, where it persists as a trace of an encounter. This persistence is not stillness. The impression remains available for further relations with other marks, surfaces, bodies and atmospheres.

Timbre names the sensate quality of these correspondences; atmosphere describes the wider field through which they continue to move. The ceramic becomes a persistent spatial body whose relations exceed the immediate circumstances of making. Its impression does not preserve a completed meaning but sustains the possibility of further encounters.

Wayfaring attentiveness therefore concerns the capacity to remain responsive to movement as it takes form, withdraws, persists and begins again elsewhere. The mark does not tell the field where to go. It briefly locates something happening, allowing the circulating relations around it to continue.

The impression locates. The field circulates. The ceramic persists. Correspondence remains in play.

The persistent ceramic body carries its own heuristic wayfaring.

Its surfaces are not simply records of actions already completed. Lines, abrasions, apertures, residues and crossings remain active as material correspondences, moving across the body and between its different registers.

The cross-marking impression is particularly suggestive. It does not settle into the surface as a static sign. It becomes a circulating spatial body: a line of movement, an intersection, a trace of force and an atmospheric disturbance.

The ceramic becomes a small performative landscape.

Here, wayfaring is not movement across a predetermined territory. It is the making of a territory through movement. The line encounters resistance, crosses other traces, disappears into surface and re-emerges elsewhere. Its trajectory is therefore produced through correspondence.

The surface becomes a place where bodies have encountered one another and where further encounters remain possible.

impression ~ circulation ~ correspondence ~ timbre ~ atmosphere

The withdrawn ceramic persists, but its persistence is not stillness.

It is the capacity to keep something moving.

The H / I becomes quite important

I would actually resist naming it too quickly as an H or I. Its ambiguity seems productive.

It can be encountered as:

H / I / crossing / interval / threshold / coordinate / aperture / interruption / orientation

But none of these need become its meaning.

Its importance is that it locates something temporarily without determining what has been located.

You might say:

The lead impression momentarily locates a relation within the emerging clay field. It is neither diagram nor symbol, but a material interruption through which the surrounding relations become briefly perceptible. As the clay continues to move, the impression moves with it, passing from an active field of making into the withdrawn persistence of the ceramic.

Or, more closely to your language:

A piece of lead came is pressed into the clay, momentarily locating a relation within the emerging field of bodies, forces and surfaces. The H/I-like impression does not fix this relation; it gives it a temporary place from which other relations can continue to unfold around it. Through firing, the impression passes further into the withdrawn ceramic, carrying not a resolved meaning but the persistence of an encounter.

And I think this gives you a particularly useful formulation for wayfaring:

The impression is a temporary locator within a wayfaring field.

It doesn't tell the field where to go. It briefly says something is happening here, while the surrounding clay continues to move.

Then, after firing:

What was once a temporary location becomes a persistent trace through which further relations may begin.

That also gives a slightly different understanding of your circulating spatial body. The H/I is not itself necessarily circulating. Rather, it momentarily locates the circulation. The surrounding field is moving, and the impression provides a temporary condensation of that movement before itself becoming part of the ceramic's deeper spatial~surfacing.

So perhaps:

emerging clay field ~ circulating relations ~ temporary locator ~ impression ~ withdrawal ~ persistent ceramic ~ further relations

That feels very close to the operative logic you have been uncovering: the mark does not stop the movement; it allows the movement to become briefly perceptible before carrying it elsewhere.

Primary: Spatial Practice

Optional secondary: Interiority / Atmosphere

Spatial Practice foregrounds the post's central concern with wayfaring, provisional location and the production of spatial relations. Interiority / Atmosphere connects the impression to the ceramic body's deeper spatial relations and its continuing capacity for correspondence.

Attentiveness as a Sensate~Heuristic Inquiry : A Spatial Practice.

I think the distinction we have been developing allows attentiveness to become much more than a general artistic virtue. In Moreton's practice, it can be understood as a sensate mode of inquiry: a way of knowing that occurs through bodily exposure to materials, spaces, atmospheres, images, histories and other bodies.

Attentiveness as Sensate Inquiry

For Moreton, attentiveness is sensate because the practice does not locate knowledge exclusively within conceptual reflection or detached observation. Knowing emerges through the body's participation in situations: through looking, touching, moving, listening, inhabiting, making and responding to the resistances and affordances encountered within particular spatial and material conditions. Attentiveness is therefore not simply a concentration upon something already constituted as an object of knowledge. It is an openness to the ways in which an encounter may alter what is available to perception and thought.

This distinction is important to Moreton's understanding of site-based practice. A site is never encountered as a neutral geographical container within which artistic activity subsequently takes place. It is already constituted through material, architectural, historical, atmospheric and bodily relations. To attend to a site is consequently to become situated within these relations. The body encounters temperature, scale, texture, sound, light, weight, movement, spatial enclosure and exposure alongside memory, association, reading and imagination. These registers cannot always be separated into discrete categories because their significance emerges through their correspondence. The sensate is therefore not simply sensory experience understood as a collection of perceptions; it is the condition through which heterogeneous registers begin to matter to one another.

This makes attentiveness inherently relational. Moreton's practice does not treat the perceiving body as an autonomous observer standing outside a world of objects. The body is itself one participant within an encounter that includes materials, architectures, apparatuses, images, texts, weather, light and other bodies. Attending to clay, for example, means becoming responsive to its plasticity, weight, moisture, resistance, drying, fracture and transformation. These are not merely technical characteristics of a material. They become active conditions within which decisions, gestures and propositions are continually revised. The material consequently participates in the production of what can be known. Making becomes a form of inquiry because the act of making changes the situation from which further understanding can emerge.

Here heuristic inquiry and sensate attentiveness become inseparable. Heuristic describes an inquiry whose direction is discovered through the encounter rather than fully determined in advance; sensate describes the bodily and material register through which that discovery occurs. Moreton's practice therefore does not proceed from a conceptual proposition towards its material realisation in a straightforward movement. It moves through an iterative field of encounter, response, resistance and adjustment. The process might be understood as:

encounter ~ attention ~ making ~ resistance ~ adjustment ~ correspondence ~ further encounter

Wayfaring attentiveness names the movement through this field. To wayfare is not simply to travel from one predetermined point to another. It is to make one's way through an environment whose conditions continually participate in the journey. Moreton's movement between site, reading, image, drawing, collage, architecture and clay operates in this manner. A text can redirect a reading of a site; a site can alter a material proposition; material resistance can produce a new drawing; a photographic image can return through a ceramic form; a ceramic body can subsequently alter the perception of the architectural environment in which it is encountered. The pathway is consequently produced through movement itself.

This also clarifies why Moreton's research collages are important within the practice. Their fragments, annotations, images, diagrams and architectural references do not merely document thought that has already taken place. They provide a spatial condition in which thought can remain in movement. Reading becomes a sensate activity because the eye moves across fragments, pauses, returns, makes connections and encounters interruptions. The collage becomes a heuristic apparatus through which relations can be tested without requiring immediate resolution. Thought is spatialised through the body of the reader.

The same principle extends into Moreton's photographic assemblages and ceramic bodies. In each case, heterogeneous registers are brought into proximity, but proximity alone is insufficient. The more significant movement is from gathering towards correspondence. Bodies begin to affect the conditions of other bodies. This is where the notion of timbre becomes useful. Timbre can be understood as the sensate quality of a relational accord: not a property possessed by an individual body, but something produced through the way bodies, materials, spaces and forces enter into correspondence.

The analogy of the flute makes this distinction particularly clear. The timbre of a flute is not contained within the instrument, nor is it produced by the breathing body alone. It emerges through the encounter between breath, body, instrument, air, material resistance, resonance and architectural environment. The player listens to the sound produced and adjusts the body again; the instrument responds to the altered breath; the room participates in the resonance. The bodies do not simply gather. They wayfare together.

Moreton's sensate attentiveness operates similarly. It seeks neither to master the material nor to dissolve the distinction between bodies. Instead, it develops an attentiveness through which bodies can enter into reciprocal adjustment. This is why correspondence is more useful than simple relation. Relation can describe a connection between things; correspondence suggests an ongoing process in which the participants are changed by their encounter.

Within this framework, atmosphere is not an additional layer placed around the work. It emerges through the sensate correspondence of bodies, materials and spatial registers. Topophilia may describe the attachment through which a place begins to matter; interiority describes the gathering and folding of relations; timbre describes their sensate resonance; atmosphere describes the wider field that becomes perceptible through this resonance. These are not separate stages but overlapping conditions within an ecological spatial practice.

The withdrawn ceramic makes this particularly evident. Firing withdraws clay from its provisional state and gives the material a new persistence, but it does not terminate the relations through which the work can continue to matter. Its apertures, cavities, surfaces, traces and intervals remain capable of encountering light, architecture, atmosphere, movement and other bodies. Its interiority is therefore not simply an enclosed physical space. It is an open capacity for further correspondence.

This is what allows the notion of infinite interiority to become productive. The ceramic does not contain an infinity of meanings or preserve every encounter that has contributed to its making. Rather, its interiority remains inexhaustible because no encounter can finally determine what it may become in relation to another body. The ceramic registers without exhausting; it persists without closing; it withdraws without becoming isolated.

Attentiveness is therefore sensate because it is fundamentally concerned with what bodies can do together. It is an embodied form of inquiry in which perception is already participation, and participation is already a form of knowing. The practitioner does not first perceive a world and then act upon it. Perception, making and thought continually modify one another.

Moreton's wayfaring attentiveness can consequently be understood as an ethics and poetics of responsiveness: an ongoing willingness to remain exposed to what materials, places, architectures and other bodies might disclose. Its purpose is not to arrive at a definitive knowledge of the site, the material or the work, but to sustain the conditions under which further correspondence remains possible.

Attentiveness is sensate because it is not attention directed towards a world from outside. It is the body's participation in a world that is already moving through it.

And this gives us, I think, a very strong conceptual chain for the practice:

sensate attentiveness ~ heuristic inquiry ~ wayfaring ~ correspondence ~ accord ~ timbre ~ atmosphere ~ further bodies

The crucial point is that timbre is not the destination of this sequence. Like the sound of the flute, it is the quality of an ongoing accord. The bodies continue to wayfare; the resonance changes; another encounter becomes possible.

Attentiveness ~ Timbre ~ Wayfaring

A reading apparatus for sensate heuristic inquiry

Attentiveness here is not a looking towards something from outside. It is a becoming involved with what is already moving between bodies.

The site is encountered through temperature, scale, texture, sound, light, weight, memory, architecture and atmosphere; clay through resistance, moisture, gravity, fracture, surface and transformation. These are not simply sensations gathered by a perceiving body. They become correspondences through which the body, material and environment begin to alter one another. Russell Moreton: Correspondence

The heuristic therefore begins in the sensate.

Reading, walking, making, drawing, photographing and inhabiting become ways of moving through an uncertain spatial field. A text can redirect a site; a site can redirect material; material resistance can redirect a drawing; an image can return through ceramic. The pathway is made through the movement itself.

Perhaps this is why the flute offers such a useful sounding.

Breath does not simply enter the instrument. Breath, body, flute, air, material resistance, architecture and listening enter into an accord. Timbre is produced between them. The bodies do not merely gather.

They wayfare together.

The same possibility begins to appear within Moreton's spatial bodies. Research collages hold thought in movement. Photographic assemblages construct provisional environments. Ceramic bodies withdraw from clay while remaining open to further correspondence. The gathered does not become contained; it becomes available for another encounter.

Timbre names something of this felt middle: the sensate resonance of bodies entering correspondence without becoming identical.

The withdrawn ceramic extends this condition. Its apertures, surfaces, cavities and intervals do not close its interiority. They allow it to remain receptive to light, architecture, atmosphere, movement and other bodies. Its persistence is therefore not an ending but a capacity.

Sensate attentiveness ~ heuristic inquiry ~ wayfaring ~ correspondence ~ accord ~ timbre ~ atmosphere ~ further bodies.

What is gathered is never simply contained.

It continues to resonate.

Attentiveness — how the body becomes receptive

Heuristic inquiry — how knowing emerges through encounter

Wayfaring — how the inquiry moves

Correspondence — how bodies alter one another

Accord — how they begin to move together

Timbre — how that accord becomes sensately perceptible

Atmosphere — how the resonance extends between bodies

Further bodies — how the proposition remains open

AxisWeb : Making, Correspondence, Spatial Practice, Heuristic Inquiry and Speculative Learning.

Russell Moreton : A Visual Fine Artist

A site-based practice developing through speculative learning, creative propositions and spatial practices.

Russell Moreton is a visual fine artist whose practice explores making as a relational and speculative encounter between bodies, materials, space and thought. Working across ceramics, drawing, photography, collage and spatial practice, he is interested in the imprint not simply as the mark of an artist upon material, but as the trace of an encounter between body, material, force, resistance, movement and time.

His site-based practice develops through heuristic inquiry and wayfaring attentiveness, exploring how craft, theory, art and architecture might enter into correspondence. Through speculative making spaces, spatial assemblages and material experiments, he develops creative propositions for knowledge production in which different bodies and disciplines can remain in dialogue without needing to converge.

Moreton's practice is increasingly concerned with spatial bodies, interiority, atmosphere and the timbre of relational encounters: how materials, places, architectures, images and bodies might enter into accord and wayfare together.

A site-based practice of heuristic inquiry in which bodies, materials and spaces enter correspondence, develop an accord and wayfare together.

Moreton's site-based practice develops through a form of heuristic inquiry grounded in wayfaring attentiveness. Site is understood not simply as a geographical location but as a situated field in which bodies, materials, architectures, images, memories, histories and atmospheres enter into changing relations. Rather than beginning with a predetermined outcome, Moreton works through encounters, allowing the conditions of a site and the resistance of materials to alter what can be perceived, thought and made.

Wayfaring attentiveness describes the movement of this inquiry: a mobile, embodied and receptive practice in which reading, walking, making, drawing, photographing, collaging, inhabiting and material experimentation become interconnected modes of spatial thinking. Knowledge emerges through correspondence rather than through the detached observation of a pre-existing object of study.

The practice therefore moves beyond gathering. Heterogeneous bodies enter correspondence, and through repeated encounter may enter into an accord—a wayfaring together in which each body alters the conditions of the others. Timbre names the sensate quality of this relational accord: the resonance produced between material, bodily, spatial and affective registers. Atmosphere emerges through this resonance rather than being imposed upon the work.

Ceramic becomes particularly significant within this ecology because firing produces material persistence without securing the proposition. The withdrawn ceramic remains capable of entering further correspondences with bodies, architectures, light, atmosphere, memory and movement. Its interiority is therefore not a closed container but an open and potentially inexhaustible capacity for further resonance. The ceramic persists, while the proposition remains in play.

Moreton's site-based practice can consequently be understood as an ecology of wayfaring bodies: a spatial practice in which making becomes a form of inquiry, correspondence becomes a mode of knowing, and material persistence creates conditions for encounters that have not yet happened.

Visual Workings~Collage Material : Spatial & Ceramic Practice: Research Collage ~ Persistent Bodies of Thought:

Visual Workings~Collage Material : Spatial & Ceramic Practice: Research Collage ~ Persistent Bodies of Thought:: Research Collage ~ Persistent Bodies of Thought: Spatial Bodies~Intermezzo~Alchemy : Nomadic Photographic Assemblage. Heuristic Devices~Appa...

Spatial~Agencements : What is gathered is never simply contained~it reverberates~

Spatial~Agencements

A Research Ecology of Making.

A practice begins somewhere between things.

A reading encounters an image.

An image recalls a place.

A place produces a movement.

A movement gathers a material.

A material resists the hand.

The resistance changes the making.

Nothing quite remains where it began.

Spatial Agencements describes this movement through a practice that gathers bodies without finally containing them. Clay, ceramic, drawing, architecture, landscape, photography, memory, reading and walking enter into provisional correspondence. Some relations become visible; others remain latent, waiting for another encounter.

The wayfarer gathers.

But gathering is not accumulation. It is a temporary bringing-into-relation.

A fragment may become a drawing.

A drawing may become a spatial proposition.

A spatial proposition may enter clay.

Clay may become ceramic.

The ceramic may enter another room, another atmosphere, another body.

The practice moves through these transformations without requiring them to resolve into a single narrative.

Here, the archive becomes mobile.

Old images, forgotten texts, abandoned propositions and previous material encounters can be returned to and disturbed by the present. What was once documentation can become material again. What appeared peripheral can become central. What seemed finished can reopen.

Archive → anarchive.

The studio consequently becomes less a place where things are produced than a situation in which bodies encounter one another.

Clay is one such body.

It receives, resists, absorbs, fractures, records and transforms. Fire changes the conditions again. What was provisional becomes persistent, but persistence does not mean closure. The ceramic withdraws from the immediacy of making while remaining available to light, atmosphere, architecture, movement and other bodies.

The work becomes a spatial body.

Not because it represents space.

Because it participates in relations that produce space.

Keywords.

spatial agencements, research ecology, wayfaring, gathering, correspondence, spatial bodies, bodying, material reciprocity, speculative learning, situated ecology, making, clay~ceramic, archive~anarchive, walking, landscape, interiority, permeability, threshold, futurity, In~~Touching,

Russell Moreton's current practice operates as a spatial ecology of making in which ceramics, drawing, photography, architecture, landscape, interiority, teaching, reading and remembered experience remain in active correspondence.

Rather than developing through a linear progression of ideas, the practice moves through encounters. Materials, images, texts, places, bodies and previous works are gathered, displaced and returned to in altered circumstances. Earlier propositions do not become resolved stages within a history of development; they remain available as active bodies within the present.

The practice is therefore situated rather than sequential.

Its spatiality does not reside simply in the production of objects with architectural or sculptural characteristics. Space emerges through the relations that form between bodies: between material and gesture, surface and interior, object and atmosphere, architecture and movement, reading and making.

The studio becomes an expanded environment in which these relations can be tested.

Making is not understood as the execution of a pre-existing idea. It is a mode of inquiry through which thought becomes distributed across material, body and situation. Clay participates in this process through its resistance, plasticity, weight, fragility and capacity for transformation. Pressure becomes trace; cutting becomes aperture; excavation becomes interior; repetition becomes difference. The ceramic body emerges through these material events rather than simply receiving a predetermined form. This emphasis on making as an active mode of knowing is already central to Moreton's recent formulation of the studio as a site of continuous exchange. 

Gathering

A recurring figure within the practice is the wayfarer.

The wayfarer gathers.

Readings, images, fragments, materials, spatial memories, drawings, architectural propositions and encounters are collected not as information to be accumulated, but as bodies that might enter into correspondence.

The gathering remains provisional.

Something is carried.

Something is placed beside something else.

A relation appears.

The bodies may then disperse, only to return through another material or situation.

Gather ~ carry ~ encounter ~ release ~ return ~ gather again.

This movement is central to the practice's relationship with the archive.

The archive is not treated as a stable repository of completed knowledge. Through collage, drawing, rereading and making, archival material becomes mobile. The old text encounters the new ceramic; the image encounters another body; a forgotten proposition becomes perceptible through a changed material condition.

The archive begins to become an anarchive.

Not because its contents are discarded, but because they begin to move again.

The archive is not proving the present practice. It is becoming capable of corresponding with it.

This is why the practice can be understood as a research ecology rather than a research method. It does not establish a fixed procedure through which knowledge is extracted. It creates conditions in which different bodies of material can encounter, trouble and transform one another.

Wayfaring

Wayfaring provides a corresponding spatial logic.

The practice moves through environments rather than simply representing them. Walking, looking, gathering and making become ways of attending to the relations already present within a place.

The wayfarer does not simply move across a landscape.

The landscape participates in the movement.

This extends into the studio. Materials, tools, surfaces, texts and images become part of a field through which the practice navigates. The resulting work is less a destination than a temporary constellation: a gathering of forces that remains open to further movement.

The spatial body is therefore not a body that contains movement.

It is a body that becomes through movement.

Correspondent bodies

Theoretical and artistic references enter this ecology not simply as sources of authority but as correspondent bodies.

Tim Ingold's thinking around correspondence and wayfaring, Karen Barad's account of intra-action and diffraction, Erin Manning's attention to movement and the anarchive, Gaston Bachelard's phenomenology of interiority, and the architectural propositions of Arakawa and Gins and Zuzana Kovar all become possible bodies with which the practice can think.

They are not applied to the work as explanatory frameworks.

They enter the work.

They alter its vocabulary.

The material encounters them in turn.

A reading can become pressure.

A theoretical proposition can become an aperture.

An architectural question can become a chamber.

A spatial memory can become surface.

The relation is reciprocal.

The ceramic body

Within this ecology, clay has become an increasingly significant participant.

The clay body gathers what has passed through the practice, but it does not simply contain it. It troubles what has been gathered through its own material resistance.

This is where the practice moves towards the idea of the Permeable Chamber.

The ceramic body is neither simply vessel nor sculpture, container nor architectural fragment. Its apertures, surfaces, cavities and thresholds produce relations between interior and exterior, enclosure and permeability, withdrawal and correspondence.

The body becomes through what passes through it.

Fire changes this proposition again.

What was provisional in clay becomes materially persistent in ceramic. The fired body withdraws from the immediate responsiveness of making, but the relations of making continue through its surfaces, apertures, weight, atmosphere and spatial presence.

The ceramic is withdrawn from making, but not withdrawn from correspondence.

It enters another temporality.

Light touches it.

Air passes around it.

Shadow inhabits it.

Architecture situates it.

Another body encounters it.

The ceramic becomes a spatial body not because spatial characteristics have been added to it, but because it continues to participate in spatial relations.

Interiority as movement

Interiority consequently becomes less a place than a movement between bodies.

It may occur within a cavity, across a surface, between an aperture and light, within the atmospheric field of an installation, or within the encounter between a viewer and a withdrawn ceramic body.

The interior is not necessarily what is contained.

It can be what emerges between.

This allows Moreton's earlier concerns with architecture, interiority, landscape, teaching and spatial research to remain active within the present practice without being reduced to historical influences. The current ceramic work becomes another site through which those concerns can be materially re-entered.

The practice is therefore less concerned with defining what a ceramic object is than with asking what relations a ceramic body can make possible.

In~~Touching

This movement brings the practice towards In~~Touching.

Touch is understood here not simply as physical contact but as a distributed condition of correspondence. Bodies can touch across distance, through light, atmosphere, memory, surface, material resistance and spatial relation.

To touch is to be altered.

To become in touch is to become responsive to what another body is doing.

The practice consequently attends to the world's patternings and murmurings: forces, traces, residues, atmospheres and movements that pass between bodies without necessarily becoming fully visible.

The ceramic body carries these murmurings forward.

But they are never its possession.

They continue elsewhere.

A spatial ecology of making

Moreton's present spatial practice can therefore be understood as a research ecology of making: a field in which gathering, wayfaring, correspondence, material encounter and transformation remain continually entangled.

Its movement might be traced as:

gathering → wayfaring → correspondence → troubling → making → firing → withdrawal → reverberation → gathering again

This is not a method.

It is a condition of practice.

The work remains open to what it has not yet understood. Its research does not seek a final position but creates temporary conditions in which different bodies can encounter one another and become otherwise.

The spatial emerges through this movement.

The ceramic body becomes spatial through correspondence.

The archive becomes anarchive through movement.

Making becomes a way of learning.

And the practice continues to wayfare.

What is gathered is never simply contained.

It reverberates. 

A Troubling Spatial Study of Bodies, Atmospheres and Correspondence.

Reading Apparatus.

Speculative spatial inquiry / practice-based research.

This is not a study of interiority. 

It is an attempt to stay with the movements through which interiority becomes perceptible.

Permeable Hosting : Around Moreton’s Interiority is an exploratory spatial study emerging from a practice of clay, ceramics, drawing, photography, fieldwork and material inquiry. It considers interiority not as an enclosed place but as a movement between bodies, surfaces, atmospheres and materials. Through the ideas of permeable hosting, correspondence, ecological bodies and the Permeable Chamber, the text follows how spatial relations emerge through trace, immersion, material duration and withdrawal. It is deliberately unresolved: a spatial text~script intended to remain open to further encounters.

surface → trace → field → body → host → atmosphere → threshold → chamber → withdrawal → correspondence

Permeable Hosting : Around Moreton’s Interiority

Interiority becomes a movement rather than a place.

This proposition begins to gather something that has been moving through Russell Moreton’s spatial practice for some time: an understanding of interiority not as an enclosed condition, nor simply as the space within a body, but as something produced through the correspondence of bodies, materials, atmospheres and forces. Interior is not necessarily what lies behind a surface. It can emerge across a surface, within a field, through a trace, between bodies, or within the temporal unfolding of a material encounter.

Moreton’s fieldworks begin from this instability.

A troubling spatial study does not resolve the spatial. It makes the spatial capable of further correspondence.

Clay, charcoal, wax, cyanotype, paper, photographic residue, light, weather, dust, earth and other relatively simple matter(s) are brought into situations where their distinctions can become unsettled. These materials are not employed simply as means towards representation. They become active bodies within an expanded field of relations. A charcoal mark can register pressure and movement while simultaneously becoming atmosphere. Wax can act as a skin, receiving, obscuring and holding. Clay can become surface, field, trace or body. Cyanotype can receive light and weather over duration, allowing an atmospheric condition to emerge through its exposure.

The field is therefore not a neutral ground upon which things are placed.

The field becomes a body through the relations moving across it.

What appears as an indexical body can begin to dissolve into its surroundings. Figure and ground lose their certainty. Trace merges with material residue; drawn bodies become absorbed into atmospheric surfaces; photographic processes allow light, fluid and weather to become participants. The body is still perceptible, but its edges are troubled. It becomes difficult to say precisely where one body ends and another begins.

This troubling is important.

The work does not seek to resolve the body back into a stable form. Instead, it attends to what becomes possible when bodies remain partially merged, when their differences continue to act upon one another. The resulting field is immersive not because it surrounds the viewer with an effect, but because it proposes another spatial condition: a space in which bodies are already implicated in one another.

What happens when a body is understood as something capable of hosting what exceeds it?

Here, permeability becomes more than a physical quality. It becomes an activity of correspondence.

A permeable body receives. It is affected. It changes through what enters it, while also changing what it receives. Hosting is therefore never a neutral accommodation. There is no unchanged host. The hosted body is altered, the hosting body is altered, and the threshold between them becomes an active interval.

This is where Moreton’s interest in the simple matter(s) of the weather world becomes significant.

Weather is not treated as a subject to be represented. Light, moisture, atmosphere, temperature, duration and exposure become ecological participants. The cyanotype made through a pinhole intermediary over hours of sunlight is one such condition: an image emerging through the passage of light, weather and time. The photographic surface hosts forces that cannot themselves be held as objects. Something of the weather world becomes materially present through its effects.

The work becomes an emergent atmospheric condition.

It is an ecological body enacting its presence through its unfolding durational existence.

This is close to the piddock, but not the same. The piddock makes its presence through the removal of matter: boring, excavating, inhabiting, producing a chamber through its activity. The cyanotype works differently. Its presence accumulates through exposure, registration and duration. One leaves a cavity; the other leaves an atmospheric trace. One makes absence perceptible; the other makes an elusive presence perceptible.

Both, however, trouble the assumption that a body simply occupies a material world.

Bodies make worlds through their activities within matter.

This becomes increasingly important across Moreton’s fieldworks. The indexical body is not merely a record of where a body has been. It is a material event through which other bodies become perceptible. A rubbing carries something of the surface encountered. A photographic exposure carries something of the light that produced it. Charcoal carries pressure, movement and gesture. Wax receives and holds traces. Clay absorbs force, resistance, touch and time.

The trace therefore becomes more than evidence.

The trace becomes another body.

And when traces gather, they produce an atmosphere.

This is perhaps where the spatial practice moves beyond an understanding of interiority as architecture or enclosure. The interior can be produced without a conventional inside. It can occur within the density of a material field, within the interval between bodies, within an aperture, or through the atmospheric relations of a situation.

Could the interior begin before enclosure?

Could a chamber emerge through correspondence rather than construction?

The clay~ceramic body takes this question somewhere else.

Field clay remains immersed in the instability of making. It can be folded, scraped, pierced, smeared, layered, collapsed and reworked. Its interiority remains close to the movement of the hand and the contingencies of matter. Clay is open to intervention.

Firing changes the proposition.

What was fluid becomes materially persistent. What was provisional becomes a body that can no longer be entered through making in quite the same way. The ceramic withdraws from the hand while becoming available to other bodies. Its surface carries the pressures and traces of its making, but its interior is no longer simply recoverable. It becomes atmospheric, spatial and withdrawn.

The body withdraws, but correspondence continues.

This withdrawal is not closure. It is another form of hosting.

The ceramic body carries something of the immersive field into another material condition. Its apertures allow light and air to pass. Its surfaces receive atmosphere. Its chamber gathers shadow. Its material persistence holds something of what happened while making itself available to what has not yet happened.

The Permeable Chamber emerges here.

It is not simply the interior of a ceramic form. It is an interval between retention and release, surface and depth, immersion and withdrawal. It gathers without completely containing. It hosts without remaining unchanged. It becomes spatial through its capacity to encounter other bodies.

The chamber is produced through correspondence.

This also changes the meaning of touch.

Touch is not restricted to direct physical contact. Light touches a photographic surface. Weather touches paper. A piddock touches clay through excavation. Fire touches clay through transformation. Air touches a ceramic aperture. A viewer's body touches a withdrawn ceramic through perception, proximity and duration.

In~~Touching therefore becomes an expanded ecological condition.

It is an attentiveness to how bodies become perceptible through the forces by which they affect and are affected by other bodies. Touch can occur across an interval. Correspondence can happen without contact becoming literal. A body can be touched by something it cannot hold.

The spatial practice gathers around this possibility.

Fieldwork, drawing, photography, collage, walking, architecture, clay and ceramic are not separate activities so much as different material situations in which interiority can move. The field merges bodies. The trace carries an encounter. The atmosphere troubles the boundary. The aperture enables passage. The chamber gathers. The ceramic withdraws.

Field ~ trace ~ body ~ host ~ atmosphere ~ chamber ~ ceramic.

These are not stages towards a final form. They are active conditions within a larger ecology of making.

Perhaps this is where Moreton’s spatial practice now gathers most intensely: not around the production of spatial objects, but around the possibility that space is continually produced between bodies that remain capable of affecting one another.

Interiority is consequently not a place waiting to be entered.

It is something that happens.

It gathers across surfaces and within bodies. It moves through atmosphere. It becomes perceptible through traces, apertures, residues, pressure, light and duration. It can immerse, trouble, withdraw and return.

Interiority becomes a movement rather than a place.

And the spatial body becomes the body capable of hosting that movement—permeable, attentive, troubled and open to correspondence with other ecological bodies.

What is gathered is never simply contained.

It reverberates.

Spatial Practice; Interiority; Permeable Hosting; Spatial Bodies; Correspondence; Atmosphere; Ecological Bodies; Materiality; Permeability; Clay~Ceramic; Indexical Bodies; Thresholds; In~~Touching; Futurity, Weather~World; Fieldwork; Material Reciprocity; Immersion; Withdrawal; Permeable Chamber; Trace; Duration; Ecological Practice, 

It reverberates.

It troubles.

So the text itself becomes a small Permeable Chamber.

It gathers fieldworks, indexical bodies, weather, clay, charcoal, wax, cyanotype, piddock, atmosphere, firing and ceramic withdrawal — but doesn't close them into a system.

That makes “troubling spatial study” more than a subtitle. It describes the mode of inquiry:

Wayfaring Forms : Living Architectures beyond Function.

Outpost 030125

A wayfaring body does not move through a finished space. It participates in making the space through attention, movement and encounter. Architecture becomes less a fixed container than a living field of relations. Lines, bodies, materials and places cross one another, opening zones of proximity and exchange. To wayfare is therefore to remain unfinished—to move attentively through spaces that are continually being made and unmade.

From Archive to Anarchive.

These correspondents do not form a theoretical framework.

They form a wayfaring apparatus.

Each opens another route through the material.

Ingold moves alongside.

Bachelard moves inward.

Pallasmaa moves through touch.

Barad moves through entanglement.

Arakawa and Gins keep the body tentative.

Kovar opens the boundary.

Manning follows becoming.

The piddock makes absence materially present.

Fire transforms persistence.

And the archive begins to move with them.

This is where archive becomes anarchive.

The old text is not corrected by the new work.

The new work does not simply illustrate the old text.

They enter correspondence.

A proposition written years ago may suddenly become perceptible through a piece of clay.

A ceramic body may return a reading that had previously remained abstract.

An image may activate a memory of a place.

A place may reappear as a spatial condition.

A fragment of writing may become a material gesture.

Old text ~ new ceramic ~ other body ~ future proposition.

The anarchive is therefore not what remains after the archive has been emptied.

It is what happens when the archive starts moving again.

Wayfaring Bodies in Attentive Movements.

This is perhaps where the particular spatial body of the practice becomes visible.

It is not a journey towards a predetermined destination.

It is a movement through relations.

Archive body reading clay touch space fire ceramic atmosphere other body wayfaring~~correspondence.

The spatial emerges through this movement.

It is not added to the ceramic afterwards.

It is aroused through the material encounter.

The ceramic body becomes a spatial body because it continues to enter relations—with light, air, architecture, place, memory, bodies and the situations into which it subsequently travels.

What is gathered is never simply contained.

It reverberates.

And perhaps this is the proposition that holds the whole field together:

Correspondence is not what happens between finished bodies.

It is how bodies become.

The practice dwells with clay.

It becomes with other bodies.

It moves through fire.

And the fired body wayfares onward—not carrying a fixed meaning, but carrying the possibility of further correspondence.

Living Architectures/Wayfaring.

Environments formed/experienced through Movement and Attention.

Lines.

Tim Ingold.

Numinous Odyssey : Raveningham

Spectral Affinities : Architectural Constellation

Processual Bodies.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/russellmoreton/

Art's Use of Architecture: Place, Site and Setting.

Artists in 'Psycho Buildings' explore architecture's psyche, through the production of places, sites and settings, sites and settings, which engender spatial experiences that connect the viewer psychically, as well as perceptually and conceptually, to broader social issues and cultural phenomena.

Art and architecture are frequently differentiated in terms of their relationship to 'function' or 'use'. Unlike architecture, art may not be useful in pragmatic terms, for example in responding directly to social needs, providing shelter or somewhere in which to perform open-heart surgery, but we could say that art provides a place for other kinds of function – self-reflection, critical thinking and social change. If we consider this expanded version of the term function in relation to architecture, we realise that architecture is seldom given the opportunity to consider the construction of critical concepts and spatial relations as its most important purpose.

Jane Rendell.

Processes/Processual Thinking that constitute entities.

Moving Attentively In The Field of Material Structure.

The Itinerant Library of Excessive Tendencies.

Heterogeneous matter driven by disparate parts and elements of assembly.

Bricoleur Performing Practices.

Discursive Inquiry/Reading/Making.

Abjection flows between bodies, it never solely concerns one body.

For Kovar, when abjection is one of those processes, a very particular assemblage manifests itself. Where boundaries are disrupted, connections made and zones of proximity that are otherwise absent, are reached. Abject(ion) causes an inherent schism on the physical and psychological levels.

It opens bodies, to one another.

It opens up bodies for 'exchange'.

Such that they are in a perpetual process of being made and unmade, unfinished bodies.

It is precisely because abject(ion) is not only psychological but also physiological that it straddles both genders and is not solely reducible to the feminine. Abject(ion) is both feminine and masculine.

This one feels very important.

It begins with Living Architectures / Wayfaring, environments formed through movement and attention, lines, Ingold, Raveningham, processual bodies, then moves through Jane Rendell and Kovar into the opening of bodies to one another.

That is already very close to your current proposition that spatial practice is not about spatial characteristics but about bodies continuing to enter relations.

The original Ceramic Bodies constellation was:

matter → movement → energy → iteration → interiority

These five introduce another set of movements:

shelter → permeability → gathering → process → wayfaring

And the two sets begin to touch.

The archive is not proving the present practice.

It is becoming capable of corresponding with it.

And Slow Philosophy may be one of the clearest examples so far: the 2021 material already contains semi-permeability, unfinished becoming, gathering, clay, surface, studio, architecture and material reciprocity.

That is much more interesting than simply saying, “this old post is relevant to my current work.”

Outpost Studio~Theoretical Spaces : Undone~Overflowing Gatherings of Experience.

Lost Inquiry : Dispersed Spaces~Relations of Space, Time, and Social Bodies.

Outpost 200125

Expanding The Files.

Undone

A theorist is one who has been undone by theory.

Rather than the accumulation of theoretical tools and materials, models of analysis, perspectives and positions, the work of theory is to unravel the very ground on which it stands. To introduce questions and uncertainties in those places where formerly there was some seeming consensus about what one did and how one went about it.

Irit Rogoff : What is a Theorist? 2006

• Russell Moreton
• visual art
• visual fine art
• spatial practice
• research creation
• ecology of experience

Assemblages of Event : Visual Art+Spatial Practices/Human Bodies/Spatial Bodies

Outpost 111225

The Everyday.

ANTONIO  He misses not much.

SEBASTIAN  No, he doth but mistake the truth totally.

The Tempest.

The Transparency Of The Morning.

One never sees what is always seen.

The immediate, just like the simple, the natural and the ordinary, does not perceive itself.

Substances : Artworks, rituals of purity and impurity.

Demarcations/Systems/Fields of order and contravention.

Material Margins/Transitional  Spatial Spaces.

Knowing that this clarity which has sprung up will soon dissipate.

Morning coincides with the emergence, giving back a possibility of springing up, of rising before the day has started to spread out.

For Jullien, it is possible to gain access to it only as we gain access to the immediacy of the day from the night. A world in which living is not right away (in which respect metaphysics is correct) it is necessary to cause it to rise. But without again being concealed by whatever has been entrusted with revealing it.

Life, is devoted from the outset to what its 'end' might be (telos) in the full sense of the Greek word.

Telos, at once a conclusion, aim, perfection, abandoning all the preceding 'between of life' to indifference.

The Way- Without demarcation, rather a way of viability by which the continuum of life is renewed.

The Philosophy of Living.

Francois Jullien.

Developing Open Subjectivities/BwO : Visual Art, Winchester. 2006.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/russellmoreton/

Bodies are conditioned by architectural surrounds.

Architectural Body.

Reversible Destiny. 

Arakawa and Gins.

The transformative body, creates bodily interiors/relations that can open up to become productive alliances in which using spatial bodies, (other than the ideal types) they can be brought into new affiliations with systems outside of their boundaries. 

Creating an affective intensity.

Human Bodies/Spatial Bodies.

Relationscapes/Bodies/Events.

Organism-Person-Environment

Event-Space-Movement, superimposed over one another creates disjunction(Tschumi) and assemblages (Deleuze).

Drawing/Beginning a dialogue with matter/material between human bodies and spatial bodies.

Simple articulations (frottage) with the immensity and immediacy of the everyday.

Abstracted-Diagrammatic-Inhabitations.

Paintings/Drawings/Sculptures/Instalations.

Francis Bacon.

The Logic of Sensation. 1981, 2003.

Deleuze.

Reliquaries/Enclosures of Spatial Silences and of Light/Air.

A type of labyrinth with a momentary impossibility of escape (soul cages)  these are minoritarian architectures (Deleuze).

Real Spaces for Fictional Events.

A becoming architecture to provoke potentials to occur.

On the everyday, abjection of the human body.

The Clinic.

Bathrooms are spaces associated with the clean body and simultaneously with the dirty body. They are spaces that allow for hygienic evacuation of our excretions, they order our un-containment.

At the end of the day , the curtain is hung and there is a certain visceral repulsion to the damp curtain hanging in the window. To the drying of our bodily excretions and their gradual visual indiscernibility with the fabric. So no one knows what the fabric has absorbed.

All that remains is us, inhaling ourselves as air passes through the curtain and into our lungs. A re-absorption of our expulsions.

Zuzana Kovar.

The work of Deleuze and Guattari as a whole provides a way of approaching all bodies void of a dualistic framework. In particular for Kovar, Deleuze's work specifically touches on abject(ion) through his notion of an open and transformative or spasmodic body, which he discusses in the work of Francis Bacon.

Figure at a Washbasin. 1976

Francis Bacon.

Event-spaces in the paintings of Francis Bacon.

The Body-Figure/Figural-Event.

From the start, the figure has been a body and the body has a place within the enclosure of the painting from which the figure expels itself, gymnastically on the fields of colour. Is this the event of a body escaping itself into a figure, of the body in Deleuzean terms of trying to escape any notion of identity/form of repression?    

For Bacon, the body-figure exerts an intense motionless effort upon itself in order to escape down the blackness of the drain. This plexus (the body as plexus) its effort or waiting for a spasm, becomes for Bacon a painterly approximation of horror or abjection.

Paintings that create spasms that re-order the human organism, in order to escape it, by growing bodily organs as prostheses, or by allowing the enclosure of painterly space and contour to become an apparatus, an extension of the body-figure-figuration.  

The body waits to escape itself in a very precise manner, to escape itself via a spasm, the movement of the figure towards the material structure, towards the field of colour.

For Deleuze, the body repeatedly attempts to escape the organism, the particular organisation of organs that may be understood as constituting the subject the 'I', for Deleuze the body attempts to escape the 'I'. It is not 'I' who attempt to escape from my body, it is the body that attempts to escape from itself by means of, a spasm. But the body is not simply waiting for something from the structure (its place is an enclosure), it is waiting for something inside itself. It exerts an effort upon itself in order to become a figure now it is inside the body that something is happening, the body is the source of movement.

Athleticism, The Logic of Sensation. Deleuze.

Elliptical Circulations

Studio Wall Spaces/Artist's Books.

Between 'Devices'

Documentation/Research/Reading/Places/Images

Interpolation/Interpolation/Interstitial. 

Sculpting In Time.

Tarkovsky.

The Poetics of Space.

Gaston Bachelard.

• Russell Moreton
• visual art
• visual fine art
• spatial practice
• research creation
• ecology of experience