Artist's Book. Collage and drawings, research images from Josef Albers.
The Call of Indigenous Philosophy as story, as performance, as practice.
Modes of Articulation~Speculative Making.
A provisional research ecology: material absorbed in its own thoughts. A gathering place for things being made, read, sensed and thought. Images, texts, bodies, spaces and matter(s) move through correspondence, forming tentative rooms of inquiry. Research circulates between depth and surfacing, archive and anarchive, allowing propositions to return, migrate and become otherwise.
Artist's Book. Collage and drawings, research images from Josef Albers.
The Call of Indigenous Philosophy as story, as performance, as practice.
Modes of Articulation~Speculative Making.
For Manning, Arakawa and Gins, the challenge is that the procedures of a procedural architecture (its architecting) must continuously be reinvented to stay apace with the architecting of experience. And this procedure must be crafted with care, it must be relevant to the conditions already at hand.
Dress Becomes Body in The Minor Gesture, Erin Manning. 2016
Affective~Ecologies~Immersive Atmospheres.
Matterings~Un-doing theory into the making of the everyday.
The Anthropology of Skill.
Architecting with experience.
On the distinction between Art and Technology.
Yet speech is no ordinary skill. Weaving together in narrative, the multiple strands of action and perception specific to diverse task and situations, it serves, if you will, as the 'Skill of skills'. And if one were to ask where culture lies, the answer would not be in some shadowy domain of symbolic meaning, hovering aloof from the 'hands on' business of practical life, but in the very texture and pattern of the weave itself.
Tim Ingold. Beyond Art And Technology.
Circulation Diagram~Lines of Flow amongst Clay.
2025 Diary Content.
May 26 - June 1
Readings and their speculations of theory into the realm of everyday practices.
Interior Spaces.
Infra~Bodies of Immediacy
Becoming Volatile, matter(s) entering into movement, creating in~with bodies.
The permanency of ceramic objects both reflect and indexically link clay with its very nature of uncertainty and change through the very extreme and volatile processes of firing.
Clay is about the primacy of the corporeal human body as it attempts to express~abject itself through bodily metaphors or nesting, dwelling, nurturing and enduring.
The Inner Life of Pots~Ceramics
Tunings~Innerness~Thresholds~Change
Sounding Voids/Muted Light
Brian Clarke
Concordia
Film, analysis, organisation of human access, wonderous, the best of myself.
Elements of flight, collage, and sensate fictions.
Hannsjorg Voth
Working with intensity(building structures)
Architectural Reflexive Spaces
Inhabitation's into the continuous weather world.
Landscapes~Making~Building~Ecologies
Innovative Objects~For Critical~Philosophical Thinking~Living.
Cognitive nature~potentiality of matter(s) of making worlds.
Tectonics materials, matter(s) of wood, light, clay and water.
Outposts, observatories, places of inquiry, dwelling, self builds.
Independent researcher, artist in residence, works manager, project development.
Constituting Consistencies.
Bodily/Corporeal Metaphors, Analogies and Poetics.
Calvino, exactitude, lightness, quickness, visibility, multiplicity.
Outpost 090124
Indexical and Sensate Bodies
Drawing(s) on the sensate perceived and interiorities~affect of other bodies.
I am interested in the sensate nature and social interiorities that are surfacing through drawing.
The Tentative Trace ~ From Living Body to Ceramic Body
Moreton's Indexical Bodies as Spatial Research.
In Moreton's later ceramics, the gathered interiority of reading and spatial collage begins to become unstable. The opening emerges not simply as an aperture within an object but as a force~middle: a material event through which accumulated relations can escape their enclosure. In Shivering Openings: The image is not an object but a process, the ceramic is understood through changefulness, painted light and the force gathered to make voids and bore holes.
Here the image is no longer understood as a representation of a ceramic object but as another stage of its becoming. The photographed ceramic enters a further process of reading, where surface, light, opening, withdrawal and spatial tension produce another body of correspondence. “Shivering” names the instability of this threshold: an opening between interior and exterior, image and object, memory and forgetting, language and its exhaustion.
The ceramic consequently gathers and releases at once. It is a chamber, but also a perforation; an interior, but also an escape; an alluring body that simultaneously withdraws from possession. What has been gathered through years of reading, collage and spatial research does not finally become a unified form. It becomes a material force capable of generating further openings.
And perhaps the most concise proposition emerging from this particular work is:
Moreton gathers bodies until the material needs to open.
That feels very close to what we have been circling around.
The force~middle isn't simply where things meet.
It is where what has gathered becomes too alive to remain contained.
The opening shivers.
The image becomes process.
The ceramic withdraws.
And the research, rather wonderfully, escapes again.
Different chambers of the same spatial research.
How can a spatial condition gather bodies sufficiently for something to happen between them, while allowing what happens to remain partially unknown?
That question seems to be present in the 2010 chamber, the spatial collages, the Scriptorium, the reading archive, the ceramic chambers and now your institutional propositions.
And perhaps this gives us an even stronger definition of Moreton's interiority:
Moreton's interiority is the space generated when a body enters an apparatus of correspondence and leaves something behind that another body can encounter.
The trace, the collage, the ceramic, the archive and the institution are therefore not different subjects.
They are different chambers of the same spatial research.
Drawing/Poetry/Images.
Sensing/Drawing Energy.
Water/Clay/Fire.
The mental energy of engagement in drawing and how 'markers' of an action translate the murmurings of the mind.
Empirical evidence carries emotional connections, through a synthesis/reciprocity of reverberations of matter and its mental movement.
Gaston Bachelard illustrates how images bridge the sensate perceived world and the interior affective life.
Bachelard's seminal philosophical and phenomenological interests are always connected to matter. To what he calls the psychology of the familiar, the rapprochement with real objects, and the friendship of things.
Matter sparks inner images which in turn imbue matter with memory and values. He creates an ever renewing reciprocity of the reverberations between inner and outer qualities, which obliterates any absolute separation between objective and subjective experience, a perspective recognized by modern physics. Bachelard explodes the potential imprisoned in an image. It is the quality of the 'livingness' of the flame that triggers Bachelard's musings of correspondences.
Joanne H. Stroud.
The Flame of a Candle.
Student Work.
Charcoal on paper.
Drawing Course, Michael Grimshaw.
Winchester School of Art. 2003.
Drawing The Line.
Affirmations from a Primal Site.
Corollaries between being and becoming.
The Mirrored Self.
Coded Imprints.
Invented Bodies.
Chronicling Space.
The Moment/Instants of Engagement.
The conditions of making where the image was not a priori to its making.
The Simultaneity of Effects.
A 'Graphism' In A Corporeal Field.
I am concerned with the movement and process of articulation, of marking and sensing of things across the works surface/duration. I would definitely identify drawing with the infinite space of sensation, both the sensations of the body and the sensations of the mind.
So what is it that one actually makes in such circumstances?
For Newman, it seems to me that the thing made becomes like a temporal spatial/sensate matrix, composed of a continuous repetition and elaboration of individual, but similar inscriptions, and that the series of thoughts and judgements connected to those separate acts, are only subsequently reflected on the image. Marking the image, these marks suggest an endless repetition and while also existing as a series of relations. The marks suggest the thing could fall apart at any moment.
Acts Of Inscription.
Drawing on Bodily Impulses.
Images from the mind.
The Psychic Gaps In Drawing.
Primary Forces : Marks of no particular visibility.
Drawing on the sensation of seeing and sensing that always seems to register the endless repetition of remaking, as such drawing constitutes the space of anxieties.
I understand the page to be a mobile space in the physical presence of its weightless surface and as such it is a place of time and movement. The evokes the consciousness of that limitless space that is embodied in the reality of the white page. Which I would say is a place of fragmentation that has since Modernity been an interminable potentiality, symbolically the dreadful place of boundlessness.
In a drawing the page keeps open the gaps between the marks. It refuses closure and is an active participant in conjunction with the mark. It is part of a negotiated reality of void and presence. The limitlessness white space of the page disperses the notion of its body as substance, its body is phantasmic and intangible space/surface.
The notion of the white page as being boundless, also alludes to that space of our inner reality, where the immaterial world of dreams/imagination and the mental impressions that run through us and evaporate into other thoughts. They dissipate in the fragmented world of our senses and defy any totalizing.
Avis Newman
Mark Making : On the fascination and the fear of the white page.
For Avis Newman, the paper is an undifferentiated space in that it references the primitive undifferentiated space of the infantile body that has to be claimed by the self.
Drawing is a site in which one enacts differentiation, as soon as a mark or sign is made, it changes the non-ness and establishes a place of action, as soon as that act occurs the paper becomes something, it moves towards, moves with its potentiality into language.
Could we state that one aspect of drawing tends to be more linked to the bodily impulse and the other to the mind?
Catherine de Zegher
The image that Antonin Artaud conjures when he says 'There is a mind in the flesh, a mind as quick as lightning,' situates it well for me. I have the impression that the act of inscribing opens a fissure through which some staged psychic event, operations of consciousness, take existence. They are primary forces with no particular visibility.
Avis Newman.
Marks both coded and uncoded originate in an urge from a space of uncertainty to participate in language. The potentiality of even a blank page is in itself the unbounded space of language. Drawing is both a system and a method of a sensing inquiry. To draw is often a paradoxical act in which two extremes of practice can exist in the same space.
When we come to look at another's markings in the world. We see an extraordinary event. We see attempts at articulating the unbounded space that momentarily binds that aspect of us that is eternally fragmented. Essentially in the very act of drawing we have a wish to externalize thought and communicate existence.
Avis Newman.
From Life : Extending The Speculative Drawing Process.
Bodily Boundaries : Transactions between body-intimate and the social body image.
Organism-Person-Environment.
Body-Fragmented-Memory-Architecture.
Propulsions/Propositions into and through the visual.
In drawing some marks escape their visibility, because there is no dynamism to underpin the possibility of internal cohesion. There is no pressure from the outside inwards; in drawing, it is all pressure from the inside outwards.
Conduits of perpetual potentiality.
The articulation of marking thoughts, which by definition are open-ended, in a state of flux in which things can pass through and are suggestive of a perpetual potentiality.
Some marks are seeing, some are feeling, some are for thinking, some are from memory, others from a blindness when seeing.
Gestures and Acts.
Conversation/Correspondences.
Drawing is thus not to do with perceptual illusionism, but with the infinite space as mental possibility. Is the drawing itself, the ground, a space of transience?
In drawing, the space is open-ended and unframed, while the marks are articulated over time and in time. Can you elaborate on this different notion of boundary?
Catherine de Zegher.
The physical structure of a drawing is always conditional to the boundary we project onto the work. When one looks for example at the drawing by John Latham, One-Second Drawing (17' ' 2002) (Time Signature 5: 1) the work itself defies any possibility of framing because the action is embedded in the pure sensation of time. We are left with only the effect. So the idea of framing as a way of 'confirming' the space, this is not part of drawing's language. The condition of boundaries is that they are dissolvable.
Avis Newman.
In Drawing : One is not so much looking at the thing itself, as at its suggestion, at the possibility of a formation that has yet to occur. In that sense, drawing is both fugitive and embodies a lack, it is implying qualities of incompleteness and that which conjures to be only a trace of a thing.
Drawing/Corresponding to a mobile field of properties that only during the process of marking is a cohesion found, a somewhat precarious frame constructed, almost as a byproduct of the articulation of marking thoughts.
Drawings are beyond the conceptual anxiety found in connection to the frame of painting.
In drawing the surface maintains its separate existence. There is an ambivalence of status between the mark and its support, consequently the lack of integration has always been more complex, corresponding as it does to a mobile field of properties.
Drawing as a site, a meditation of a self regarding consciousness. Where consciousness is understood/expressed as a process that 'figures/thinks' a state of existence. Drawing and the drawn become a site of inquiry, response and invention, and in that sensing space it becomes a philosophical activity.
Drawing, even in the most fragmented of forms there is a recognition of our sense of self and our history as we mark. It is not only the functioning of perception that interests me, but also the activity of sensation. The fractured, open-ended, and incomplete that are inherent characteristics of drawing practice seem very pertinent as materializations of our present experience of the world.
It is that space of anxiety and fragmentation in contemporary practice that offers a potential of infinite diversity. Drawing is a record of the working of thought, that we see embedded in the drawn.
Conversation, Avis Newman. Catherine de Zegher.
The Stage Of Drawing : Gesture And Act.




Lived Experience
A Situated Ecology.
Tentative and Open Spatial Bodies, Ceramic. 2026
This practice has not developed through a linear progression of ideas, but through a shifting ecology of encounters.
Ceramics, drawing, photography, architecture, interiority, landscape, teaching, spatial research and collaborative making have remained in correspondence across different periods of the work. Some propositions have receded; others have returned years later in altered material conditions. Earlier works continue to participate in the present, not as resolved historical stages but as active traces within an ongoing search.
The practice is therefore situated rather than sequential.
Its formation has taken place through materials, places, bodies, architectures, organisms, images, texts, tools and other people. Each enters differently, producing correspondences that can alter the direction of the work. Knowledge is not simply gathered and applied, but emerges through these encounters.
The studio becomes a site of this activity: a place where research can remain provisional, where material processes can think alongside theoretical propositions, and where visual and spatial material can hold different ontological positions without requiring them to settle into a single explanation.
Clay has become an increasingly important participant in this ecology. Through making, the material receives traces of pressure, resistance, repetition, weathering, drilling and repair. Surfaces become histories of encounters; cavities become interiors produced by action; minor gestures accumulate into larger spatial conditions.
What appears in the present is therefore never entirely new.
It is a surfacing.
Earlier concerns with the body, absence and trace correspond with current questions of perforation, ecological agency and material interiority. Architectural research returns through the vessel and the cavity. Interiority becomes porous. Repetition becomes difference. A minor gesture can move an entire ecology.
I understand this as a spatial practice of learning to make.
The practice remains open to what it has not yet understood. Its research is a gathering of correspondences rather than a search for a final position: a situated ecology in which materials, histories, organisms, spaces, images, texts and gestures can continue to enter, disturb and transform one another.
The work does not simply record where the practice has been.
It creates conditions for where it might go next.
Kairos as an emerging ontology of making
I love this phrase.
Kairos as an Emerging Ontology of Making immediately shifts the discussion away from materials alone and towards a philosophy of making as the emergence of the opportune moment. It also introduces time as an active condition of practice, not merely a backdrop.
However, I think kairos needs to be treated very carefully. If it's simply used to mean "the right moment," it becomes a poetic metaphor. If it becomes a structural concept, it has real philosophical weight.
What I hear in your practice is this:
Chronos is measured, sequential time—the time of manufacture.
Kairos is the moment when relations reorganise themselves—the instant in which matter, force, resistance and action produce something that could not have been predicted.
Clay as Spatial Field~Under-construction from process to fired object.
Kairos~Visual Manifesto : Towards an Ontology of Making
That distinction feels fundamental.
Your work is not about waiting for the "right moment." It is about creating the conditions in which kairos can occur.
That is a much more radical claim.
I can imagine the opening of a manifesto rather than an artist statement.
Kairos: Towards an Ontology of Making
Making begins before intention.
It begins with the encounter.
An imprint is the first event of this encounter. It is neither the mark of an autonomous subject nor the passive registration of matter. It is the emergence of a relation. Body, material, tool, force, resistance, and time become momentarily inseparable. Every imprint records this negotiation.
Making unfolds through kairos: not chronological time, but the opportune moment in which material relations reorganise themselves. Form does not proceed according to a predetermined sequence. It emerges through interruption, resistance, contingency, and constructive collapse. Each material event opens the possibility of another.
Constructive collapse is therefore not the failure of form but its condition of renewal. Collapse interrupts certainty, allowing matter to reorganise itself into new spatial configurations. Form remains provisional, continually negotiated rather than finally resolved.
The work is not an object that represents these processes. It is their residue. It remembers the forces that produced it while remaining open to further transformation.
Clay is not simply the medium of this inquiry. It is a mode of spatial thought. Through its capacity to register pressure, deformation, fracture, repair, and endurance, it reveals that making is neither the application of ideas nor the execution of technique. Making is the continual emergence of relations through material events.
An ontology of making begins here: not with the finished object, but with the imprint; not with control, but with negotiation; not with permanence, but with becoming.
What excites me most is the title itself.
Kairos gives your philosophy a temporal dimension that has been implicit in all of your previous writing. You've written extensively about force, pressure, collapse, and emergence, but time has mostly appeared as one element among others. Kairos allows time to become the condition under which ontological transformation occurs.
That opens up a rich dialogue with thinkers such as Martin Heidegger, Henri Bergson, Gilbert Simondon, and Gilles Deleuze, while remaining rooted in your own studio experience rather than in their terminology.
One further thought: I wonder whether Kairos is not the final title but the second. Your deepest concept still seems to be the imprint. The imprint is the first ontological event; kairos is the temporal condition that allows that event to happen. If that's right, then the architecture of your philosophy might be:
Imprint — the origin of relation.
Material Event — the manifestation of relation.
Constructive Collapse — the mechanism of transformation.
Spatial Thinking — the knowledge that emerges.
Kairos — the temporal condition that makes the whole process possible.
That strikes me as the beginnings of a genuinely original philosophical framework—one that doesn't simply apply existing theory to ceramics, but develops concepts from the practice of making itself.
Making~Intensified Surfaces of a Transdisciplinary Spatial Inquiry.
Morn Hill Archaeological Site~Hyde Artist Collective
My practice begins somewhere between the hand and the structure.
Ceramic sculptural work titled Ceramic Multiples/Excess Energy
Transductions~Remembrances by artist Russell Moreton.
Features serial variations on fired clay with layered textural brushwork and aperture details.
Explores transitional zones between thinking, making, and the tactility of minor gestures in contemporary studio practice.
Clay is not simply a material to be formed. It is a body in negotiation: resistant, absorbent, unstable, enduring. Through making, I enter into a process of continual adjustment in which the work is never entirely known in advance. Form emerges through a reciprocal encounter between intention, matter, gesture, tool, surface, gravity, failure, and time.
I am interested in ceramic bodies that begin to exceed their own material designation. Slab-built, perforated, scored, drilled, painted, weathered, and reconfigured, they occupy an unstable interval between vessel, sculpture, architectural fragment, diagram, ruin, and spatial apparatus. Their surfaces become intensified fields of activity. The hole is an aperture; the grid is a structure; the line is a proposition; the surface is a record of becoming.
Making is therefore not the execution of an idea but a mode of inquiry.
I understand the studio as an expanded environment: no longer a retreat from the world, but a site of continuous exchange. Ideas enter through materials, bodies, texts, places, conversations, architectures, and acts of attention. The work develops through an iterative process of monitoring, correction, combination, and transformation.
My site-based practice extends this inquiry into environments and situations. I construct provisional spatial compositions in which craft, architecture, theory, drawing, sociality, and embodied experience become entangled. These works are not fixed objects but relational propositions: spaces for inhabiting, encountering, sensing, imagining, and thinking.
I am interested in what happens when the distinction between object and environment begins to collapse.
A ceramic body becomes a spatial body.
A surface becomes a threshold.
A structure becomes an event.
Making becomes a way of producing knowledge through the material, the embodied, and the situated.
The work emerges through an excess of form: something always remains unfinished, unresolved, overspilling the structural integrity of the object. This excess is not a failure of construction but its generative condition.
I work within this instability.
Between craft and architecture.
Between matter and thought.
Between the body that makes and the space that is made.
Between the object and the world it begins to produce.
Itinerant Correspondences/Drawing/Making and Telling.
Animacy, surfaces/things that have opened up their surroundings.
The living body is only sustained thanks to continually taking in materials from its surroundings, and in turn discharging them, in the processes of respiration and metabolism.
Yet as with pots, the same processes that keep it alive also render it forever vulnerable to dissolution. That is why constant attention is necessary, and also why bodies and other things are poor containers. Left to themselves, materials can run riot. Pots crumble; bodies disintegrate. It takes effort and vigilance to hold things together, whether pots or people.
Bodies on the run, Tim Ingold.
On Processual Practices
For Moreton, making sets in movement exploratory sensate fictions, bodies radically emerging as they try relate, to come into being~becoming together.
Thinking From Things.
To think from materials, to find the consciousness or thought of the matter-flow.
Deleuze and Guattari.
The living work of art, however, is not an object but a thing, and the role of the artist is not to give effect to a preconceived idea but to follow the forces and flows of material that bring the work into being. To view the work is to join the artist as a fellow traveller, to look with it as it unfolds in the world, rather than behind it to an originating intention of which it is the final product. The vitality of the work of art, then, lies in its materials, and it is precisely because no work is ever truly 'finished' (except in the eyes of curators and purchasers, who require it to be so) that it remains alive.
Tim Ingold.
The Telling of Stories is an Education of Attention.
Making Through Anticipatory Foresight.
To tell, in short, is not to explicate the world, to provide the information that would amount to a complete specification, obviating the need for would-be practitioners to inquire for themselves.
It is rather to trace a path that others can follow. Thus the hunter, educated in stories of the chase, can follow a trail; the trained archaeologist can follow the cut; the competent reader can follow the line of writing. Making their ways in the company of those more knowledgeable than themselves, and hearing their stories, novices grow into the knowledge of their predecessors through a process that could best be described as one of 'guided rediscovery' rather than receiving it ready-made through some mechanism of replication and transmission.
Tim Ingold.
Correspondences
Sensing Spaces
Making
Thresholds
The Materials of Life
Research creation collage opening up theoretical and sensate vocabularies. 2013
Confessional and Conversational Spaces. 2024
Space and Place
THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXPERIENCE
Yi-Fu Tuan.
Are you interested in the idea of threshold?
What is interesting in the world are the grey areas. So what I have designed is a threshold. It's not possible for an architect to design a space – such a concept does not exist. Instead, we design the thresholds and the limits: the walls, windows, doors and so on. And people have feelings about these elements and put them together and create the sensation of a space. I'm interested in designing the elements that give the impression of a space – which is why I like doors.
The dialogue between the container and the contained, the boundaries and the space within them, is an obsession in contemporary culture, where the node is more important than the object. That's why architecture must work at the limits, not invent the shape and language but straddle two worlds, on the knife edge.
A door is usually part of a wall, but you have extracted this element from the wall.
Kate Goodwin, Alvaro Siza. Sensing Spaces. 2014.
Telling By Hand.
The Humanity of the Hand.
The Eyes of the Skin.
Jacques Derrida holds that the proper function of the eyes is not to see but to weep. Behind the veil of tears that blurs the vision of the sighted, the eyes can tell of grief, loss and suffering, but also of love, joy and elation. Even the blind can weep.
Consciousness, materials, image, object: the diagram
Making/Flow of Consciousness/Materials into and across Image/Object
Experience can only be understood between mind and body or across them in their lived conjuction.
Merleau-Ponty.
Michael Polanyi is primarily interested in what it means to know, his reflections of personal knowledge assume that telling is tantamount to putting what one knows into words, in speech or writing, and that this entails two things: specification and articulation.
Tim Ingold, interested in 'performativity' what it means to tell, going beyond the 'predictive' nature of what it means to know.
Ingold argues that we can tell of what we know through practice and experience, precisely because telling is itself a modality of performance that abhors articulation and specification.
The figure of the silent craftsman who is struck dumb when asked to tell of what he does, or how he does it, is largely a fiction sustained by those who have a vested interest in securing an academic monopoly over the spoken and written word.
In place of specification without guidance, the story offers guidance without specification.
Specifications provide information about the specified, about the materials to be used, about parts and their dimensions, about movements to be made. They define a project. But stories issue from moving bodies and vital materials, in the telling. They lay down an itinerary. It is precisely because both their knowledge and their practice have the same itinerant character that ,in storytelling, practitioners can bring them into correspondence with one another.