A Troubling Spatial Study of Bodies, Atmospheres and Correspondence.

Reading Apparatus.

Speculative spatial inquiry / practice-based research.

This is not a study of interiority. 

It is an attempt to stay with the movements through which interiority becomes perceptible.

Permeable Hosting : Around Moreton’s Interiority is an exploratory spatial study emerging from a practice of clay, ceramics, drawing, photography, fieldwork and material inquiry. It considers interiority not as an enclosed place but as a movement between bodies, surfaces, atmospheres and materials. Through the ideas of permeable hosting, correspondence, ecological bodies and the Permeable Chamber, the text follows how spatial relations emerge through trace, immersion, material duration and withdrawal. It is deliberately unresolved: a spatial text~script intended to remain open to further encounters.

surface → trace → field → body → host → atmosphere → threshold → chamber → withdrawal → correspondence

Permeable Hosting : Around Moreton’s Interiority

Interiority becomes a movement rather than a place.

This proposition begins to gather something that has been moving through Russell Moreton’s spatial practice for some time: an understanding of interiority not as an enclosed condition, nor simply as the space within a body, but as something produced through the correspondence of bodies, materials, atmospheres and forces. Interior is not necessarily what lies behind a surface. It can emerge across a surface, within a field, through a trace, between bodies, or within the temporal unfolding of a material encounter.

Moreton’s fieldworks begin from this instability.

A troubling spatial study does not resolve the spatial. It makes the spatial capable of further correspondence.

Clay, charcoal, wax, cyanotype, paper, photographic residue, light, weather, dust, earth and other relatively simple matter(s) are brought into situations where their distinctions can become unsettled. These materials are not employed simply as means towards representation. They become active bodies within an expanded field of relations. A charcoal mark can register pressure and movement while simultaneously becoming atmosphere. Wax can act as a skin, receiving, obscuring and holding. Clay can become surface, field, trace or body. Cyanotype can receive light and weather over duration, allowing an atmospheric condition to emerge through its exposure.

The field is therefore not a neutral ground upon which things are placed.

The field becomes a body through the relations moving across it.

What appears as an indexical body can begin to dissolve into its surroundings. Figure and ground lose their certainty. Trace merges with material residue; drawn bodies become absorbed into atmospheric surfaces; photographic processes allow light, fluid and weather to become participants. The body is still perceptible, but its edges are troubled. It becomes difficult to say precisely where one body ends and another begins.

This troubling is important.

The work does not seek to resolve the body back into a stable form. Instead, it attends to what becomes possible when bodies remain partially merged, when their differences continue to act upon one another. The resulting field is immersive not because it surrounds the viewer with an effect, but because it proposes another spatial condition: a space in which bodies are already implicated in one another.

What happens when a body is understood as something capable of hosting what exceeds it?

Here, permeability becomes more than a physical quality. It becomes an activity of correspondence.

A permeable body receives. It is affected. It changes through what enters it, while also changing what it receives. Hosting is therefore never a neutral accommodation. There is no unchanged host. The hosted body is altered, the hosting body is altered, and the threshold between them becomes an active interval.

This is where Moreton’s interest in the simple matter(s) of the weather world becomes significant.

Weather is not treated as a subject to be represented. Light, moisture, atmosphere, temperature, duration and exposure become ecological participants. The cyanotype made through a pinhole intermediary over hours of sunlight is one such condition: an image emerging through the passage of light, weather and time. The photographic surface hosts forces that cannot themselves be held as objects. Something of the weather world becomes materially present through its effects.

The work becomes an emergent atmospheric condition.

It is an ecological body enacting its presence through its unfolding durational existence.

This is close to the piddock, but not the same. The piddock makes its presence through the removal of matter: boring, excavating, inhabiting, producing a chamber through its activity. The cyanotype works differently. Its presence accumulates through exposure, registration and duration. One leaves a cavity; the other leaves an atmospheric trace. One makes absence perceptible; the other makes an elusive presence perceptible.

Both, however, trouble the assumption that a body simply occupies a material world.

Bodies make worlds through their activities within matter.

This becomes increasingly important across Moreton’s fieldworks. The indexical body is not merely a record of where a body has been. It is a material event through which other bodies become perceptible. A rubbing carries something of the surface encountered. A photographic exposure carries something of the light that produced it. Charcoal carries pressure, movement and gesture. Wax receives and holds traces. Clay absorbs force, resistance, touch and time.

The trace therefore becomes more than evidence.

The trace becomes another body.

And when traces gather, they produce an atmosphere.

This is perhaps where the spatial practice moves beyond an understanding of interiority as architecture or enclosure. The interior can be produced without a conventional inside. It can occur within the density of a material field, within the interval between bodies, within an aperture, or through the atmospheric relations of a situation.

Could the interior begin before enclosure?

Could a chamber emerge through correspondence rather than construction?

The clay~ceramic body takes this question somewhere else.

Field clay remains immersed in the instability of making. It can be folded, scraped, pierced, smeared, layered, collapsed and reworked. Its interiority remains close to the movement of the hand and the contingencies of matter. Clay is open to intervention.

Firing changes the proposition.

What was fluid becomes materially persistent. What was provisional becomes a body that can no longer be entered through making in quite the same way. The ceramic withdraws from the hand while becoming available to other bodies. Its surface carries the pressures and traces of its making, but its interior is no longer simply recoverable. It becomes atmospheric, spatial and withdrawn.

The body withdraws, but correspondence continues.

This withdrawal is not closure. It is another form of hosting.

The ceramic body carries something of the immersive field into another material condition. Its apertures allow light and air to pass. Its surfaces receive atmosphere. Its chamber gathers shadow. Its material persistence holds something of what happened while making itself available to what has not yet happened.

The Permeable Chamber emerges here.

It is not simply the interior of a ceramic form. It is an interval between retention and release, surface and depth, immersion and withdrawal. It gathers without completely containing. It hosts without remaining unchanged. It becomes spatial through its capacity to encounter other bodies.

The chamber is produced through correspondence.

This also changes the meaning of touch.

Touch is not restricted to direct physical contact. Light touches a photographic surface. Weather touches paper. A piddock touches clay through excavation. Fire touches clay through transformation. Air touches a ceramic aperture. A viewer's body touches a withdrawn ceramic through perception, proximity and duration.

In~~Touching therefore becomes an expanded ecological condition.

It is an attentiveness to how bodies become perceptible through the forces by which they affect and are affected by other bodies. Touch can occur across an interval. Correspondence can happen without contact becoming literal. A body can be touched by something it cannot hold.

The spatial practice gathers around this possibility.

Fieldwork, drawing, photography, collage, walking, architecture, clay and ceramic are not separate activities so much as different material situations in which interiority can move. The field merges bodies. The trace carries an encounter. The atmosphere troubles the boundary. The aperture enables passage. The chamber gathers. The ceramic withdraws.

Field ~ trace ~ body ~ host ~ atmosphere ~ chamber ~ ceramic.

These are not stages towards a final form. They are active conditions within a larger ecology of making.

Perhaps this is where Moreton’s spatial practice now gathers most intensely: not around the production of spatial objects, but around the possibility that space is continually produced between bodies that remain capable of affecting one another.

Interiority is consequently not a place waiting to be entered.

It is something that happens.

It gathers across surfaces and within bodies. It moves through atmosphere. It becomes perceptible through traces, apertures, residues, pressure, light and duration. It can immerse, trouble, withdraw and return.

Interiority becomes a movement rather than a place.

And the spatial body becomes the body capable of hosting that movement—permeable, attentive, troubled and open to correspondence with other ecological bodies.

What is gathered is never simply contained.

It reverberates.

Spatial Practice; Interiority; Permeable Hosting; Spatial Bodies; Correspondence; Atmosphere; Ecological Bodies; Materiality; Permeability; Clay~Ceramic; Indexical Bodies; Thresholds; In~~Touching; Futurity, Weather~World; Fieldwork; Material Reciprocity; Immersion; Withdrawal; Permeable Chamber; Trace; Duration; Ecological Practice, 

It reverberates.

It troubles.

So the text itself becomes a small Permeable Chamber.

It gathers fieldworks, indexical bodies, weather, clay, charcoal, wax, cyanotype, piddock, atmosphere, firing and ceramic withdrawal — but doesn't close them into a system.

That makes “troubling spatial study” more than a subtitle. It describes the mode of inquiry:

The Arts and The Humanities : The inherent finality of the human condition is concisely and eloquently measured and mapped.

Drawing/Image.

The Active Body : From Trace to  Hosting Permeability. 

The traced body becomes a field rather than a boundary. Cyanotype moves through the drawn figure, botanical traces enter its surface, and astronomical markings exceed the body that appears to contain them. Presence and absence begin to occupy the same material territory. The image becomes a body of traces—part registration, part seepage, part cartography—where what is gathered cannot remain entirely within its assigned limits. Read through the current practice, the work begins to open towards permeability: the body as a threshold through which other bodies, times and forces pass.

Speculative inquiry 190926

This is perhaps the most interesting question I would carry forward:

What happens when the trace is no longer evidence of a body, but becomes a body capable of carrying other bodies?

That moves the work from indexical trace → permeable body → ceramic body.

The old cyanotype already contains the proposition that the boundary of the body can be exceeded by material movement. The current ceramic practice could be understood as taking this further: permeability is no longer simply represented on the surface; it becomes materially constructed through aperture, porosity, chamber and firing.

That feels like a genuine correspondence rather than a retrospective explanation.

.

Russell Moreton  Spatial Practices MA, UCA Canterbury.

Visual artist who currently uses simple descriptive gestures and processes drawn directly from the human body. His practice continues to explore issues around "Spatiality" and the "Postmodern Human Condition." The use of site specificity and materials "at hand" are employed to further underpin the practitioners sense of place, memory and dwelling. His descriptive working narratives are in effect physical working ideas, spatial  entanglements between the relations of  life and art.  

Drawing.

Installation and Working Sites

Architectural Glass and Ceramics

Liquid Light and Pinhole Photography

OUTLINE

Drawings by sculptors that place the relationship of the line derived from the body on the same field as material/media residues. These configurations give rise to conceptual associations and meanings. This contemporary approach is in evidence in a number of artists work where the per formative aspects of drawing are the key issue. To put it simply there is a growing awareness of the gesture of drawing as the work, and not just simply the representational merit of recognition that has previous acquainted skill and draughtsmanship. I am talking about the authentic gesture of inscription, the combination of both the trait and trace that the trait has circumscribed. This almost primal visual rendering from a sensation of blindness is captured succinctly in the myth of Butades, or as it has come to be known "the birth/origin of painting” This myth preserved through the device of its very nature contains an irony trapped, almost withheld until the contemporarily of its content could be recognized. It is my aim to expand on these issues using the situation of my own practice as a bridge to attempt to illustrate some of the complexities unearthed.

Analysis of a drawing.

Crafting the mind : Human Inhumation/Containment

Julian Stair

Quietus/The Body Politic

Morality

Jonathan Sacks

Jozef Van Wissem

Grand Central Confessional.

More Speculation~Other Bodies.

A body appears, but it does not remain entirely its own. Botanical traces, photographic fluids, celestial markings and the drawn line gather across its fragile surface. The cyanotype seeps beyond the territory of the figure, while the astronomical markings seem to pass through it from another side. The body becomes a host for other bodies.

What happens when a boundary begins to host what exceeds it?

The question is not simply where the body ends, but what begins to happen when other matter(s) enter, pass through and alter its territory. The body becomes atmospheric: not an enclosure, but an immersive condition of correspondence.

Can an atmosphere be produced through the correspondence of bodies rather than exist around them?

Here, trace becomes more than registration. It becomes a movement between bodies—seed, paper, light, fluid, hand, image, celestial map, memory. Each leaves something behind while carrying something elsewhere.

The host does not simply contain. It is changed by what it hosts.

The figure is therefore neither wholly present nor absent. Its outline fixes a body even as the materials moving through it undo that fixity. What appears as a final marking becomes another opening.

Body-as-site becomes body-as-host.

And perhaps the host becomes something stranger still: an immersive atmosphere of corresponding bodies, a temporary spatialisation in which nothing is quite contained by the thing that carries it.

What is gathered is never simply contained. It reverberates.

That feels much closer to the spatial script you are describing.

The bold questions aren't really questions requiring answers. They are apertures in the text. They alter the direction of reading. The declarative phrases then become propositions, while the questions open them again.

Nature Boy.

He said that in the end it is beauty

That is going to save the world, now.

Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds

THE PHYSICAL

THE EMOTIONAL

THE CONCEPTUAL

First Intension (noun) Medicine the healing of a wound by natural contact of the parts involved.

Fecundity, Fertility, Creativity, Inventiveness, Fruitfulness, Productiveness. What response within ones subjectivity created the desire and its necessity to be embodied, to be brought into the realm of things?

CREATIVE POST-MORTEM 19.08.2010.

Outline of a female body on light-weight Chinese paper, life size, laid out as if in the process of making passage through a fluid. The body stance seems tensioned with arms outstretched and together above the head, as is it is being propelled, or conversely the feet together might signify the body is sinking into a space occupied by a fluid. The body seems to be caught in some sort of stasis, between sliding back or diving head first. This outline has been in places in filled with a blue photographic material ( cyanotype).

This material that displays a floral print caused by the displacement and actuality of seed heads having been placed directly in contact with the paper. This floral marking occupies only part of the territory which was once occupied by the body. There is evidence that this fluid substance (blueprinting of a fecundity) has transgressed, seeped through the boundaries of the traced form. It has done so through the cyanotypes fluidity and the absorbency inherent in the structure of the paper. Within the territory of the body, there are spaces void of the cyanotype material, these appear as barren areas, unfertile yet they seem to suggest an infinite space which gives the cyanotype surface its ability to both record an actuality and suspended it. This appears to question the spatio-temporal aspect of the relations between the application of the fluid and the drawing of the trace. 

What is apparent is that they have become superimposed and strangely contingent. There exists a sense of transition between fluidity of the cyanotype and the fixed “registration” of the hand drawn trace this creates different senses of temporalities on the same surface. The residues left over from the cyanotype process are still clearly visible, channelled into a flow which is delivered to a reservoir at the foot of the trace. The outline in what appears to be black marker pen preserves a permanence against this flow. This same marked permanence records an intervention of two back slashes which tags a closure of performance of the trace with a date simply stated across the foot. One might be tempted to consider if this marking and its proximity might have associations that reference the labelling of the mortuary corpse. 

The inclusion of this precise date marking, renders other material traces some sort empirical touchstone, an observation point clearly defined from which to see other phenomena present. This observational mode of inquiry is perhaps promoted by what appear to be astronomical markings that are only "‘present” within the territory of the body, curiously they appear to have been inscribed from the reverse side of the paper. They appear akin to body markings, tattoos or some other form of writing information on the body. 

These marks suggest some sort of cartography which can only be read by others, this information is clearly “hosted” for the benefit of others, a message that might contain an augury. The host body might be a vessel for these speculations, but it is clearly not their author in fact the astronomical details place their own authorship right through the vessel of this un-gendered female form. Given that the astronomical markings have been assigned to a human form, a form of mobility the knowledge of these marks therefore exceeds the temporality of the host form, in the literal sense this is already confirmed by an existence only recorded by its trace, its absent presence. 

This terrestrial being with its absent presence marked and dated is further appropriated into a territory containing celestial mappings and traces from its own host planet. The inherent theme of fecundity and fragility supported by the inherent finality of the human condition is concisely and eloquently measured and mapped. Like a shroud this work is delivered to reaffirm the body as a site.

There is no authority in the gesture, it is an act of reassurance, he is fixing reality. James Salter

The post is much more interesting for the current practice than its title initially suggests. The cyanotype, traced body, seepage, astronomical markings, date, absence/presence and cartography already bring together several things you are now calling body, trace, chamber, correspondence and futurity. The cyanotype is particularly important because the material does not simply stay within the traced body: it seeps across its boundary.

Spatial Bodies of Practice~Gathering/Multiplicity/Lightness/Synthesis

Spatiality is being discovered as a condition of correspondence between bodies.

What begins as lightness becomes density. Images, ruins, fragments, colour, readings and places gather without settling into a single structure. The work moves between material transformation and the impossibility of containing everything that has been encountered. Chora appears as trace, mark, map and body: a spatial condition where things can occupy one another without becoming the same. Read through the current practice, synthesis becomes less a resolution than a gathering of differences. The spatial body begins to form through multiplicity—through what touches, overlaps, withdraws and remains unresolved.

Speculative inquiry 190926

I think this post opens an important question for gathering:

Can gathering remain multiple without becoming synthesis?

This is significant because your current Permeable Chamber is almost the opposite of a synthetic container.

It gathers, but does not resolve.

It holds, but does not contain.

It allows correspondence without requiring agreement.

So perhaps something has shifted:

synthesis → multiplicity → gathering → permeability

The old post is therefore not simply about “synthesis”. It contains a tension that the current practice can activate: the desire to gather without closing the gathered material into a resolved whole.

That is very close to your recent formulation:

The Permeable Chamber is where gathering becomes a troubling reverberation.

Outpost 190822

LIGHTNESS

QUICKNESS

EXACTITUDE

VISIBILITY

MULTIPLICITY

Six Memos for The Next Millennium.

Italo Calvino, 1992.

The difference between the first versions I read and the final ones lies in structure, not content. 

Calvino wanted to call the sixth lecture 'consistency' and he planned to write it in Cambridge. 

I found the others, all in perfect order, in the Italian original, on his writing desk ready to be put into his suitcase.

Esther Calvino.

The Drought.

J.G. Ballard.

Allegories are, in the realm of thoughts what ruins are in the realm of things.

Walter Benjamin on the origin of German Tragic Drama.

Photographic ruins an amalgam/agency of what remains.

Brown and Blue.

A Field in England.

Cyanotype material on canvas with iron pigment.

Developing a spatial serenity/synthesis/synergy.

This amalgam of colour with various substances demonstrates the change and transformation of the material world, which can be interpreted as essentially an alchemistic procedure.

The goal of such procedures is ultimately to resolve the material object into its spiritual substance.

Yves Klein.

Beuys Brown and Klein Blue.

Magdalena Broska.

Air and Dreams.

An essay on the imagination of movement.

Gaston Bachelard.

Shotesham, site based inquiry,studio practice.

Spatial registers around the corporeal and the transcendental.

Ruin its relation to time.

Fragment as ruin and on melancholia as an attitude of retrospective contemplation.

Dialectics at a standstill, a moment where the past is recognized in the present as a ruin that was once desired, allowing allegory to be understood, felt as a contemplative calm, an equilibrium in the becoming and wrapping nowness of the self/situation.

Dialectical thinking involves the clarification of ideas through discussion and contradiction.

What remains after the process of dialectical thinking?

An initial thesis is opposed by an antithesis, then resolved through a synthesis of the two terms, which can in turn become a new thesis.

Objects/inclusions for painting with/layered transitions and movements.

Holga 120WPC, f135.

Ilford Delta 100/8 exposures 92x55mm.

The Gaze of Orpheus.

Maurice Blanchot.

The Essential Solitude

In the solitude of the work, we see a more essential solitude, a self communion.

MULTIPLICITY

The work grew denser and denser from the inside through its own organic vitality.

For Musil, knowledge is the awareness of the incompatibility of two opposite polarities. One of these he calls exactitude or at other times mathematics, pure spirit, or even the military mentality, while the other he calls soul, or irrationality, humanity, chaos.

Everything he knows or thinks he deposits in an encyclopedic book that he tries to keep in the form of a novel, but its structure continually changes; it comes to pieces in his hands.

The result is that not only does he never manage to finish the novel, but he never succeeds in deciding on its general outlines or how to contain the enormous mass of material within set limits.

The network that links all things is also Proust's theme, but in him this net is composed of points in space-time occupied in succession by everyone, which brings about an infinite multiplication of the dimensions of space and time.

The world expands until it can no longer be grasped, and knowledge, for Proust, is attained by suffering this intangibility. In this sense a typical experience of knowledge is the jealousy felt by the narrator for Albertine.

It is the extension of that being to all the points in space and time that it has occupied and will occupy.

But we cannot touch all these points. If only they were indicated to us, we might perhaps contrive to reach out to them. But we grope for them without finding them. Hence mistrust, jealousy, persecutions. We waste precious time on absurd clues and pass by the truth without suspecting it.

Remembrance of Things Past : The Captive.

 

Infra-ordinary.

Species of Spaces

We sleep through our lives in a dreamless sleep.

But where is our life?

Where is our body?

Where is our space?

Georges Perec.

CHORA : trace/mark/map/body

The drama of encountering space.

Recombinant Poetics via Interventions.

Thinking about temporal issues through visual, material and spatial registers.

Concerned with artworks and architectural projects that reconfigure the temporality of sites, repositioning the relationship of the past and the present in a number of different ways.

Allegory, Montage, Dialectical Image.

Between Art and Architecture.

Jane Rendell.

Performativity/Drama of Residency

Transient readings and encounters.

Other Enactments,Dialogues,Relationalities. 

Sites of evidence/knowledge and understanding.

The scheme should incorporate both careful repair of existing fabric and a significant element of new construction in a contemporary design.

SPAB, design competition.

We are not calling for a new disordered architecture to match the disorder of culture; this would only affirm the chaotic. 

Rather, we propose experiments in search of new orders, projections of new relationships.

We do not wish to transpose our study into a system or method.

The energy inherent in opening up relationships presents us with a continuity of ordering that compels refection.

Steven Holl. 

Correlational Programming, Parallax.

This one has enormous potential for the current practice.

It gathers Calvino, Benjamin, cyanotype, ruins, Bachelard, Shotesham, material transformation, multiplicity, Proust, Perec, chora, montage, temporality and the refusal to turn the investigation into a fixed system. The particularly important phrase for me is the post's own recognition that “We do not wish to transpose our study into a system or method” and its interest in opening relationships.

That is remarkably close to where your current practice has arrived.

The deeper speculative proposition

What I think is emerging from these four posts is that the current spatial practice may not simply be about making ceramic bodies spatial.

It may be about something more particular:

Spatiality is being discovered as a condition of correspondence between bodies.

The earlier work repeatedly approaches this through different media:

cyanotype allows material to seep beyond the traced body;

collage and montage allow fragments to occupy a shared field;

diagram allows temporal and spatial relations to remain in movement;

the vessel allows surface and interior to sense one another;

walking allows place and body to continually alter one another.

Clay now becomes a particularly intense site for all of these propositions because it can receive, resist, absorb, register, perforate, enclose, open and transform.

Then firing changes the proposition again.

Sensing Spaces~Telling By Hand : The Tacit Dimension : Thresholds on that we can know more than we can tell.

Itinerant Correspondences/Drawing/Making and Telling. 

Animacy, surfaces/things that have opened up their surroundings.

The living body is only sustained thanks to continually taking in materials from its surroundings, and in turn discharging them, in the processes of respiration and metabolism. 

Yet as with pots, the same processes that keep it alive also render it forever vulnerable to dissolution. That is why constant attention is necessary, and also why bodies and other things are poor containers. Left to themselves, materials can run riot. Pots crumble; bodies disintegrate. It takes effort and vigilance to hold things together, whether pots or people.

Bodies on the run, Tim Ingold. 

On Processual Practices

For Moreton, making sets in movement exploratory sensate fictions, bodies radically emerging as they try relate, to come into being~becoming together.  

Thinking From Things.

To think from materials, to find the consciousness or thought of the matter-flow.

Deleuze and Guattari.

The living work of art, however, is not an object but a thing, and the role of the artist is not to give effect to a preconceived idea but to follow the forces and flows of material that bring the work into being. To view the work is to join the artist as a fellow traveller, to look with it as it unfolds in the world, rather than behind it to an originating intention of which it is the final product. The vitality of the work of art, then, lies in its  materials, and it is precisely because no work is ever truly 'finished' (except in the eyes of curators and purchasers, who require it to be so) that it remains alive.

Tim Ingold.

The Telling of Stories is an Education of Attention.

Making Through Anticipatory Foresight.

To tell, in short, is not to explicate the world, to provide the information that would amount to a complete specification, obviating the need for would-be practitioners to inquire for themselves.

It is rather to trace a path that others can follow. Thus the hunter, educated in stories of the chase, can follow a trail; the trained archaeologist can follow the cut; the competent reader can follow the line of writing. Making their ways in the company of those more knowledgeable than themselves, and hearing their stories, novices grow into the knowledge of their predecessors through a process that could best be described as one of 'guided rediscovery' rather than receiving it ready-made through some mechanism of replication and transmission.

Tim Ingold.

Correspondences

Sensing Spaces

Making

Thresholds

The Materials of Life

Research creation collage opening up theoretical and sensate vocabularies. 2013

Confessional and Conversational Spaces. 2024

Space and Place

THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXPERIENCE

Yi-Fu Tuan.

Are you interested in the idea of threshold?

What is interesting in the world are the grey areas. So what I have designed is a threshold. It's not possible for an architect to design a space – such a concept does not exist. Instead, we design the thresholds and the limits: the walls, windows, doors and so on. And people have feelings about these elements and put them together and create the sensation of a space. I'm interested in designing the elements that give the impression of a space – which is why I like doors.

The dialogue between the container and the contained, the boundaries and the space within them, is an obsession in contemporary culture, where the node is more important than the object. That's why architecture must work at the limits, not invent the shape and language but straddle two worlds, on the knife edge.

A door is usually part of a wall, but you have extracted this element from the wall.

Kate Goodwin, Alvaro Siza. Sensing Spaces. 2014.

Telling By Hand.

The Humanity of the Hand.

The Eyes of the Skin.

Jacques Derrida holds that the proper function of the eyes is not to see but to weep. Behind the veil of tears that blurs the vision of the sighted, the eyes can tell of grief, loss and suffering, but also of love, joy and elation. Even the blind can weep.

Consciousness, materials, image, object: the diagram

Making/Flow of Consciousness/Materials into and across Image/Object

Experience can only be understood between mind and body or across them in their lived conjuction.

Merleau-Ponty. 

Michael Polanyi is primarily interested in what it means to know, his reflections of personal knowledge assume that telling is tantamount to putting what one knows into words, in speech or writing, and that this entails two things: specification and articulation.

Tim Ingold, interested in 'performativity' what it means to tell, going beyond the 'predictive' nature of  what it means to know.

Ingold argues that we can tell of what we know through practice and experience, precisely because telling is itself a modality of performance that abhors articulation and specification.

The figure of the silent craftsman who is struck dumb when asked to tell of what he does, or how he does it, is largely a fiction sustained by those who have a vested interest in securing an academic monopoly over the spoken and written word.

In place of specification without guidance, the story offers guidance without specification.

Specifications provide information about the specified, about the materials to be used, about parts and their dimensions, about movements to be made. They define a project. But stories issue from moving bodies and vital materials, in the telling. They lay down an itinerary. It is precisely because both their knowledge and their practice have the same itinerant character that ,in storytelling, practitioners can bring them into correspondence with one another. 

Cyanotype Drawings : Landscapes/Maps and Performative Drawings

Mapping Relationships : Contexts and Locations #2
Collage and drawing with cyanotypes, photographs, negatives and painted surfaces.

Mesh/Material/Light, Cyanotype Process
Cyanotype is a photographic printing process that produces a cyan-blue print. Engineers used the process well into the 20th century as a simple and low-cost process to produce copies of drawings, referred to as blueprints. The process uses two chemicals: ammonium iron(III) citrate and potassium ferricyanide.

The English scientist and astronomer Sir John Herschel discovered the procedure in 1842.[1] Though the process was developed by Herschel, he considered it as mainly a means of reproducing notes and diagrams, as in blueprints.[2] It was Anna Atkins who brought this to photography. She created a limited series of cyanotype books that documented ferns and other plant life from her extensive seaweed collection.[3] Atkins placed specimens directly onto coated paper, allowing the action of light to create a silhouette effect. By using this photogram process, Anna Atkins is regarded as the first female photographer.[4]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Cathedral : Place Studies

Pastoral Space: Material, Inquiry and Craft.#5

Material Agency : Carl Knappett, Lambros Malafouris

Visualising Environmental Agency

 

"Agents are defined as persons or things, which have the ability and intention to "cause" something "in the vicinity" or "in the mileau" to happen ( Gell 1998)"

"These latter artefacts are described with the term "index", to remove the appellation "art" and to imply that they are indexes of agency."

Some Stimulating Solutions, Andrew Cochrane.

 

Template and Form 2010.The Yard, Winchester.

Omslagsfoto : 

Landscapes from the Metropolis of Death. Otto Dov Kulka.

Mapping Relationships : Contexts and Locations #3

Collage and drawing with cyanotypes, photographs, negatives and painted surfaces.

Blueprint : Kengo Kuma, Sensing Spaces.

Panspermia : Cyanotype Drawing
Drawing on paper,150x240 cms
Full size human form drawn through "performance" on paper with cyanotype and black ink. Astronomical data and traces of seed heads together with reference material/notes (directed panspermia) in pencil.

Anthropomorphic and Botanical Cyanotype Drawing (Detail)
Botanical traces with leper graves


We live our lives sunk in vast forgetting. Milan Kundera, IGNORANCE.

Human mapping of social groups from the occupancy of the Winchester Cathedral "Space for Peace" 2011.
Mono Print : Cyanotype process on paper, 52x42cm.

• Russell Moreton
• visual art
• visual fine art
• spatial practice
• research creation
• ecology of experience

Objects and Traces/Map Reading : Visual Archaeology/Anthropology in Social Space

The map fosters interpretation and exploration

Inseparable Attendant : Place and Process

Assemblage and blueprint : Site drawing/Leper Graves

Drawing figure/ground, documentation of work in progress.

Life "drawing" trace on paper with water and field chalk. Work submitted to Interfaith Group Show at the Link Gallery, Winchester 2010.

"This particular event invokes for me the notion of simple material relations and collaborative gestures that underpin human agency. Art space/practice can promote these working intimations."       Artist's Statement (archive)  07.12.2009.

Anthropological Landscape : Morn Hill, Winchester

Panspermia : Cyanotype Drawing
150x240 cms
Human form drawn on paper with cyanotype and black ink. Astronomical data and traces of seed heads together with reference material/notes (directed panspermia) in pencil.

180621

Spatial Practices/Apparatuses/Events : The Scriptorium : Collage, Architecture and Blueprints.

A HUT WITHIN THE INFLUENCE AND NATURE OF ARCHITECTURE

The tendency of technological culture to standardize environmental condition and make the environment entirely predictable is causing a serious sensory impoverishment. Our buildings have lost their opacity and depth, sensory invitation and discovery, mystery and shadow.

Juhani Pallasmaa. Hapticity and Time.

Notes on Fragile Architecture. 2000

Contemporary artists aim to produce specific relations with the technologies they adopt and adapt;
This schematic offers a partial taxonomy.
Caroline A. Jones, Sensorium : Embodied Experience, Technology and Contemporary Art 2006

Immersive
the "cave" paradigm, the virtual helmet, the black-box video, the earphone set

Alienated
taking technology and "making it strange," exaggerating attributes to provoke shock, using technologies to switch senses or induce disorientation

Interrogative
work that repurposes  or remakes devices to enhance their insidious or wondrous properties; available data translated into sensible systems

Residual
work that holds on to an earlier technology, repurposes or even fetishizes an abandoned one

Resistant
work that refuses to use marketed technologies for their stated purpose; work that pushes viewers to reject technologies or subvert them

Adaptive
work that takes up technologies and extends or applies them for creative purposes, producing new subjects for the technologies in question 

Domain-Court-Cell : Research Collages, UCA Interior Design MA

02/10/21



https://www.flickr.com/photos/russellmoreton/24401545681/in/datepost

Acts of Drawing/Derrida : Becomings through immaterial, memory and blindness.

JACQUES DERRIDA THE SCEPTICISM OF DRAWING:

“perception belongs to recollection.” Butades daughter’s act is in blindness, as if she was drawing a declaration of love.

Jacques Derrida in 1993 wrote an extensive text to accompany an exhibition of paintings from the Louvre. This text titled Memoirs of the Blind, The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins contains within it some particular references to “Pliny’s Origins of Painting." Together with the aid of illustrations of paintings on this theme, he examines and interrogates their philosophical and historical qualities.

Derrida makes particular mention and emphasis of the “state of blindness” in his analysis of the Butades myth. In particular the notion of  “scepticism” which is at the very heart of drawing. This notion of the “difference between believing and seeing”1, and what he remarks as “believing one sees and seeing between” evokes the emergence of a “glimpse” caught in a state in which “doubt ever becomes a system“2. There is a moment of delay between the gaze with its vigilance and attention, and what one reflects upon seeing. These actions will conspire to create the moment of conclusion. So by keeping the thing in sight it is being constantly examined but not reflected on, until the point when the gaze is averted to the drawing .It is a this instant, withdrawn from the sight of the object, that a “blindness” forces the recollection (the moment of conclusion to emerge) to which the drawn mark is visual evidence of that moment Derrida makes the observation that representations substitute memory for perception and that blindness is a constant withdrawal into memory. Derrida is of the view that drawings, paintings are “representations drawn most often from an exemplary narrative." This myth of Butades with its “exemplary narrative” relates directly to the absence or invisibility of (being in) the drawing process whilst in the presence of the object, that the very act of drawing withdrawals and blinds its participant. Butades daughter is “blinded” in the acts of both love and the act of drawing. Through these conditions it can be seen that Butades daughter is blind to the vision of her lover and in drawing around his projection she is forced to recollect and reflect to produce a conclusion of that action by the simple gesture and act of an inscription drawn aided by a flickering silhouette.

Derrida uses the example of the painting by J. B. Suvee “Butades or the Origin of Drawing 1791” or as it is referred in English as “The Daughter of Butades Drawing the Shadow of Her Lover ” to illustrate that it was “as if one drew only on the condition of not seeing.” The drawing in effect becomes a “declaration of love destined for or suited to the invisibility of the other.”3 Derrida comments that the origin of drawing may have become born from the desire to create some sort of surrogate mark which originates “from seeing the other withdrawn from sight.“4 The important observation Derrida continues to make is that the daughter in “following the traits of a shadow or a silhouette” who is in effect drawing on a blindness which will through recollection, initiates a sense with which she is in effect “already loves in nostalgia.”5

Derrida dwells on the very nature of drawing moving away from “the origin of drawing” to “the thought of drawing” he comments that the thought of a drawing has a “certain pensive pose, a memory of the trait that speculates, as in a dream, about its own possibility.”6 It is as if the potency of drawings is a projected development that occurs as Derrida states “on the brink of blindness.” This notion of the “trait” (a feature to a line, stroke, or mark) a visible presence that accompanies the lines odyssey, a sense of presence that can witness something of the invisible in the visible is touched upon. ’’Merleau-Ponty’s The Visible and the Invisible is cited by Derrida as having already made “Indications” in this respect Derrida footnote from The Visible and the Invisible seems to sum up something of the invisibility and presence of the trait acting on a drawing. This extract taken from the “working notes” section of the book it reads” One has to understand that it is visibility itself that involves a non visibility.”7

Distilled from the salient points of Derrida’s extensive interrogation Memoirs of the Blind seems to acknowledge the fact that “whether Butades daughter follows the tracts of a shadow or a silhouette or even if she draws on the surface of a wall or in a veil.”8 the resultant inscription in any event “inaugurates an act of blindness.” Derrida’s revelation is that “perception belongs to recollection.” Butades daughter’s act is in blindness, as if she was drawing a declaration of love that simultaneously that also contains her anticipation of a loss, and as a result, a nostalgia that is reflected upon before it is actually perceived.

1  . Jacques Derrida, Memoirs of the Blind, The Self Portrait and Other Ruins (Chicago: Chicago Press, 1993),page 1.

2  .Ibid., page 1.

3  .Ibid., page 49.

4  .Ibid., page 49.

5  .Ibid., page 51.

6  .Ibid., page 3.

7   Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968),257.

8   Jacques Derrida, Memoirs of the Blind, page 51.